| Peripatus Home Page |
Updated: 15 May 2005 |
AbstractSome basic pre-telescope advice is offered for newcomers to the hobby of observational astronomy. Keywords: telescope, magnification, buy, purchase, resources, astronomy magazines, astronomy books IntroductionAnybody with an interest in astronomy wants to immediately rush out and buy a telescope; it's only natural. But one can indeed should travel a long way down the road before having to plunge in and spend up large on a telescope of your own. Maybe money's no object: ok, in that case buy whatever you like. Otherwise, though, put in as much legwork as you can stand, before you make that big purchase. At the very least, the experience will help you refine the kind of telescope you want to own. At best, it will be a rewarding experience in its own right, and an opportunity to fully explore your own commitment to the hobby before finally settling on a budget for various flash accessories. Suppose you spend $500 (or whatever it might be) on a telescope today. If you lose interest in 3 months time, you'll regret having spent anything. Yet if your interest in astronomy becomes a consuming passion, you'll regret not spending more. So take the time to find out. |
|
||||||||||
Read, Learn, PointThe first step is to learn your way around the night sky without any optical aid at all. After all, if you can't even point your finger at M13, how do you ever expect to find it with a telescope? (Even expensive computer-guided Schmidt-Cassegrains require orientation by pointing them at a number of known objects.) My advice is to begin with an inexpensive planisphere and a suitable book, and learn to recognise the constellations, first and second magnitude stars, and naked-eye planets by sight. |
|||||||||||
Magazines and BooksHappily, the hobby of amateur observational astronomy is well served by a number of excellent magazines, two of which are pre-eminent: Astronomy and Sky & Telescope. Those two aside, the following list is completely idiosyncratic and should not be misconstrued as any kind of a comprehensive or representative survey. |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| One problem I have found with the magazines is their authority. Lets take something as well-known as the Pleiades: a not-too-ancient article from Astronomy Magazine (July 1997, p. 79) states: If you observe the Pleiades on an exceptionally dark and transparent night, be sure to look for an elusive clue to its youth. Just south of Merope lies a faint nebulosity designated NGC 1435 the most visible portion of a vast cloud of dust that still surrounds this cluster, the last remnants of a dusty birth. | |||||||||||
| Florid language aside, this is simply not the modern view;
the weight of current professional opinion holds that the Pleiades cluster has drifted
into the outskirts of the molecular cloud responsible for the NGC 1435 reflection nebula,
which is unrelated to the birth of the cluster [® sidebar].
However, the older view is very thoroughly entrenched in the amateur astronomical
literature and, even today, is faithfully copied from article to article, book to book, by
writers who obviously are not active in the field. Creatures
borrowed and again conveyed, We come now to the crux (no pun intended) of the amateur astronomers problem. We crave information which is accurate and up to date, but the obvious source the professional literature is largely inaccessible to us. Some of it is certainly beyond the usual laymans comprehension, although with patience and perseverance it is surprising how many professional articles we can understand, so that isnt the main problem. The main barriers to a home subscription to, say, the Astrophysical Journal are cost and, surprisingly, storage space. (The ApJ grows along ones shelves at two or more metres per annum and, unfortunately, the publisher has no current plan to produce the journal on CD ROM, although Internet access is available for subscribers.) And, of course, the ApJ is only one of many publications to which wed like access. |
|
||||||||||
| As a general rule, although I'd prefer not to bet my own money on this, a good book should be more authoritative than a magazine article. Books, especially textbooks, are generally peer reviewed by a number of experts. A basic library of books will reflect the path to enlightenment taken by its owner. It might comprise: | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| Once you move beyond this level, then you'll know far better than me what to aim for. With textbooks of the calibre of Carroll & Ostlie, Böhm-Vitense, and Tayler available, and more specialised professional titles beyond those again, you'll never outgrow your hobby, never be in danger of exhausting your subject. | |||||||||||
BinocularsYour next step is to beg, borrow or buy a pair of 7 x 50 binoculars. They need not be of any great quality or expense; just try to make sure they are the 7 x 50 variety. Those with greater magnification than 7x are very hard to hold steady to see your target well, and those with smaller apertures than 50mm do not collect enough light to show dim objects well. Binoculars are most readily deployed with the aid of a deck lounger, especially for objects which happen to be near the zenith, but a supple neck is an adequate substitute. You will also require a suitable companion (again, the Collins Guide will get you started, but there are also specialist binocular companions such as Crossan & Tirion's Binocular Astronomy. A pair of inexpensive binoculars and a decent guide, with or without the lounger, will set you up for at least a year's worth of interesting investigation. In the course of observing, you'll learn your way around the sky with confidence, pick up the necessary observational vocabulary and expertise to locate more difficult targets, and hopefully begin to learn some of the science behind the pretty lights as well. To me, at least, that is the whole point. |
|||||||||||
ObservatoriesSupplement your binocular sight-seeing with frequent visits to your local observatory, and others if you can get to them. Most will offer at least one open-to-the-public night a week, fees should be modest or non-existent, exhibits interesting and updated frequently, and those institutions that are worth their salt will allow visitors to look at a few selected objects through one of their telescopes. Don't forget to attend at different times of the year, so as to see a variety of objects. If possible, strike up an acquaintance with the staff. Evening tours including telescope viewing are often staffed by volunteers from local astronomical associations; these people are worth getting to know, as are any of the professional astronomers who are keen enough to turn out on open night. |
|||||||||||
RobotsThe idea of a robot observatory is for remote users to be able to log observing requests, usually over the Internet, and then simply wait for the robot telescope to automatically photograph the desired object and e-mail back the resulting CCD image. Depending upon the sophistication of the facility, one should be able to specify coordinates, magnification, wavelength filter, exposure, and so on. |
|||||||||||
| One of the earliest of the free-to-the-public robots was Bradford, now, sadly, defunct. For literally years Bradford became the Mary Celeste of robotic telescopes. You could register at the web site, and receive an automatic e-mail providing a username and password. Using them, you could then log targets for the robot to observe. It all worked perfectly. But, following the Index and Guide >> Last 500 Observations links, you could discover that the last time Bradford actually recorded an image was on Sunday May 4, 1997, at 08:14:53 BST. Creepy. (I tried e-mailing the programme director ... alas, no reply.) The site was finally decommissioned in September 2002. | |||||||||||
| Another valiant attempt which seems to have been abandoned is the (American, I believe) Global Telescope Network Inc. It might still be worth trying their URL (www.globaltelescope.com) from time to time, to see if they reappear. | |||||||||||
| Three robots that are still going seem to be rather less accessible to the general public. I managed to register at the Iowa site, but never received any e-mail back to allow me to sign on and log requests. | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| Although the implementations available today do not seem to be particularly "public-friendly," the robot concept is brilliant. Surely it is only a matter of time before genuinely accessible and useful services along these lines will emerge. | |||||||||||
Done All That?Then I guess you are ready to buy a telescope, after all. You may find it useful to read Magnification Doesn't Matter. Do NOT seek advice from the department- or camera-store which is selling the telescopes. Mostly they have no idea what they're doing, and only care about making a buck. Don't get sucked in! With rare exceptions (I met my first just this month!) these bastards do not deserve your money. |
ReferencesCrossan, Craig; Tirion, Wil (1992): Binocular Astronomy. Willmann-Bell, Inc. 182 pp. (Available direct from Sky and Telescope.) David Ellyard Collins Eyewitness Handbook to the Southern Sky Kaler, James B. (1997): Stars and Their Spectra. Cambridge. (Corrected paperback ed.) 300 pp. Malin, David; Frew, David J. (1995): Hartung's Astronomical Objects for Southern Telescopes. A Handbook for Amateur Observers. Melbourne University Press. 428 pp. Ridpath, Ian; Tirion, Wil (1984): Collins Guide to Stars and Planets. Collins. 384 pp. Smith, Robert C. (1995): Observational Astrophysics. Cambridge. 443 pp. Tirion, Wil (1991): Cambridge Star Atlas 2000.0. Cambridge University Press. White & Bally (1993): Astrophysical Journal, 409: 234, 20 May 1993. Zeilik, Michael (1991): Astronomy: The Evolving Universe (6th ed). Wiley. |
| Peripatus Home Page |
Contact me. |