Peripatus Home Page pix1Black.gif (807 bytes) Evolution >> Major Events in the Evolution of LifeUpdated: 28-Dec-2020 

Major Events in the Evolution of Life


Abstract

This page provides a high level review of some of the main threads of the evolution of plants and animals, from the origin of life to the present day.

Keywords: evolution, metazoan radiation, Ediacaran, Cambrian, Embryophyta, tetrapods, Permian, extinction, dinosaurs, angiosperms, mammals, humans

Introduction

Life on earth has a long and rich history, dating back almost to the time when the Earth’s crust solidified. Prior to that, the planet was unrecognisable. Catastrophic bombardment by meteors likely re-melted the entire planetary crust repeatedly; any life that may have evolved would have been wiped out. It is even possible this may have happened more than once.

Life may have evolved quite soon after the formation and cooling of a solid crust with liquid water, after the worst of the planet-forming bombardment from space had ceased. The oldest fossils known to date, from the Apex Chert of Western Australia, are dated to around 3.5 Ga (3,500 million years ago). However, prior to the 1960s, little was known about the long Precambrian history of life. As far as was widely known, the fossil record sprang into existence in the Cambrian, already exhibiting a high degree of development and diversity: the so-called Cambrian explosion of animals.

Plants had existed since the earliest fossils were formed, but did not achieve a high degree of organisation until vascular plants evolved on land, perhaps during the Ordovician. There, they modified the environment, promoted the formation of true soils, and established new ecological niches without which animal life on land could scarcely have flourished.

The chordates appear to have been present from at least the mid Cambrian, and diversified throughout the early Paleozoic, giving rise to fishes and, later, to the tetrapods which began to invade the land in the Devonian and Carboniferous. The first of these creatures were amphibians, tied to the water, but the evolution of the amniote egg allowed subsequent groups to become truly terrestrial. By the close of the Paleozoic, reptiles, dinosaurs, and mammal-like reptiles had taken possession of the land.

The Mesozoic was famously the “age of dinosaurs”, although their early days were perhaps more tentative than previously thought (Brusatte 2018). An exotic collection of specialised reptiles, including the giant aquatic reptiles and the pterosaurs, also dominated their respective environments at this time. At some point prior to the late Jurassic, the earliest birds diverged – according to the most widely held view – from theropod dinosaur stock.

In the Mesozoic, possibly as early as the Jurassic, the angiosperms (flowering plants) diverged from the Gnetales, or possibly the Bennettitales, leading to an enormous radiation of this group beginning in the mid-Cretaceous. The angiosperms are the most diverse group of land plants living today.

Mammals also became established and diversified throughout the Mesozoic, but their great radiation, and the establishment of the modern families, would not occur until the Paleocene. Of particular interest to us, human ancestry can be tentatively traced back into the late Miocene, although lineages (which species evolved into which) remain rather unclear until at least the Pliocene.

Origins and Early Development

As recently as the 1960s, as far as was widely known, the fossil record sprang into existence in the Cambrian, already exhibiting a high degree of development and diversity (at least of animals). Indeed, Charles Darwin (Origin, Chapter IX) recognised that the sudden appearance of animal fossils in the Cambrian posed a problem for his theory of natural selection. He suggested that “before the lowest [Cambrian] stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably far longer than, the whole interval from the [Cambrian] age to the present day; and that during these vast, yet quite unknown, periods of time, the world swarmed with living creatures” (Darwin 1859, p. 307).

He was quite correct, on both counts.

Life may have evolved quite soon after the formation and cooling of a solid crust with liquid water, after the worst of the planet-forming bombardment from space had ceased. It has been suggested that life possibly originated more than once, but was wiped out by heavy bombardment which melted the crust again. It seems unlikely that we can ever know about that.

“Several authors have suggested that comets or carbonaceous asteroids contributed large amounts of organic matter to the primitive Earth, and thus possibly played a vital role in the origin of life. But organic matter cannot survive the extremely high temperatures (>104 K) reached on impact, which atomize the projectile and break all chemical bonds. Only fragments small enough to be gently decelerated by the atmosphere – principally meteors of 10-12–10-6 g – can deliver their organic matter intact. The amount of such ‘soft-landed’ organic carbon can be estimated from data for the infall rate of meteoritic matter. At present rates, only ~0.006 g cm-2 intact organic carbon would accumulate in 108 yr, but at the higher rates of ~4 x 109 yr ago, about 20 g cm-2 may have accumulated in the few hundred million years between the last cataclysmic impact and the beginning of life. It may have included some biologically important compounds that did not form by abiotic synthesis on Earth” (from Anders 1989, Abstract).

As recently as the 1960s, as far as was widely known, the fossil record sprang into existence in the Cambrian, already exhibiting a high degree of development and marvellous diversity: the so-called “Cambrian Explosion” (see below). Indeed, Charles Darwin (Origin of Species – 2nd ed. Chapter IX) recognised that the sudden appearance of animal fossils in the Cambrian posed a problem for his theory of natural selection. He suggested that “before the lowest [Cambrian] stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably far longer than, the whole interval from the [Cambrian] age to the present day; and that during these vast, yet quite unknown, periods of time, the world swarmed with living creatures.”

He was quite correct, on both counts.

Oldest Traces of Life

The oldest rocks known are those of the Isua Supracrustal Group of southwestern Greenland, surviving from around 3700 Ma but, unfortunately, preserving no fossils. The Isua rocks are strongly metamorphosed; although some sequences have been demonstrated to be of sedimentary origin, and may have once contained fossils, the heat and pressure to which they have been subjected will have destroyed them. Isotopic signatures of carbon recovered from these and similarly aged rocks provides indirect evidence that life may have existed in these remote times (Rosing 1999, Brack 2001, Ueno et al. 2006).

It should, however, be noted that a number of less enthusiastic commentators advise approaching such an interpretation with extreme care (e.g. van Zuilen et al. 2002).

Oldest Body Fossils

The oldest fossils known to date, derive from the Apex Chert, a formation of the Pilbara Supergroup occuring in northwestern Western Australia, and dated at 3,465 Ma (± 5 Ma, see Schopf 1999, pp. 88-89). However, the fossils occur in fragments of rock within the chert; thus they are even older, though by how much, is unknown. The organisms themselves are filamentous, composed of distinct, organic walled cells occurring as a uniserial string, and are interpreted as cyanobacteria.

Also occurring in the Pilbara Craton of western Australia, the Strelley Pool Chert (SPC) includes structures interpreted as stromatolites. A 2006 study of these concludes that the evidence “strongly indicates that organisms flourished on a broad peritidal platform 3.43 Gyr ago in the Pilbara, rapidly taking hold and creating a reef-like build-up in shallow waters as surfaces became submerged. The variety of stromatolites present indicates that the SPC may contain not only some of Earth’s earliest fossils but also a diverse fossil ‘ecosystem’, sustained by shallow seawater free of terrigenous influx – ideal conditions for phototrophism” (Allwood et al. 2006, pp. 717-8).

Molecular Clock Estimates

Some molecular clock analyses suggest an even earlier origin: Hedges 2002 estimates the divergence of Bacteria and Archaea at >4 Ga, noting however, that “the fidelity of genetic replication and repair systems in the early history of life is unknown, and the different environment of early Earth might have affected rates of molecular change. It is for these reasons that we have less confidence in the time estimates for the earliest splitting events” (p. 842). A phylogenetic tree constructed from highly conserved portions of the iron/manganese superoxide dismutase enzyme sequence (Kirschvink et al. 2000, p. 1404) suggests an age for this divergence of 3 to 4 Ga.

Martin & Sousa 2016, p. 9, “embrace” what they believe to be “about the surest thing we can say about early evolution, namely, that it occurred in the absence of molecular oxygen. If some molecular oxygen arose in the atmosphere through photolysis of water or other means, there was so little of it that it was irrelevant for microbial physiology and evolution, which was not occurring in the atmosphere anyway. In early evolution, O2 can be neglected. Early microbial evolution was the age of anaerobes.”

“The issue of cyanobacterial antiquity is directly related to the question of Earth’s atmospheric history. Most students agree that prior to the evolution of cyanobacterial photosynthesis there could have been only trace amounts of oxygen in the atmosphere, perhaps 10-10 atm 02, (Holland 1984). Higher oxygen concentrations must have been generated photosynthetically. The presence of hematite iron formations has been used as prima facie evidence for cyanobacterial oxygen production, but it is possible that these sedimentary deposits were generated by the photooxidation of ferrous iron dissolved in anoxic early Archean oceans” (Knoll 1996).

“… Despite low global pO2, relatively high concentrations of oxygen could have accumulated locally in association with high cyanobacterial productivity; however, oxygen oases would have been transient in time and space. Therefore, obligately aerobic organisms could not have evolved until pO2 reached stable and global levels of 1-2% PAL [present atmospheric level] (Chapman & Schopf 1983)” (Knoll 1996).

PLACEHOLDER

PLACEHOLDER

Around 605 to 590 Ma, the Varanger glaciation occurred; possibly the most profound planet-wide glaciation in our history. During the event, the earth biota suffered its first “mass extinction” – primarily of acritarchs.

DEBUG: PaleoMajorTaxa:Archean

PLACEHOLDER

END DEBUG

First Metazoans

There can be little doubt, on the basis of trace evidence alone, that bilaterian metazoans existed from early in the Ediacaran. Although some traces are simple, rather featureless, winding trails, “others display transverse rugae and contain pellets that can be interpreted as of fecal origin. The bilaterian nature of these traces is not in dispute. Furthermore, such traces must have been made by worms, some of which had lengths measured in centimetres, with through guts, which were capable of displacing sediment during some form of peristaltic locomotion, implying a system of body wall muscles antagonized by a hydrostatic skeleton. Such worms are more complex than flatworms, which cannot create such trails and do not leave fecal strings” (Valentine 1995, p. 90). Sets of paired hypichnial ridges may hint at an arthropod s.l. presence, although the enigmatic Yilingia spiciformis is apparently not an arthropod (Chen et al. 2019).

Unfortunately, it is equally true that the relatively few body fossils known from the late Precambrian do not shed much light on the sequence of evolutionary advances that led to the famously diverse Cambrian taxa. There are a few sign-posts, however:

  • Sponges are widely recognised as the most primitive of living metazoans, occupying a basal position in metazoan phylogeny, as a sister group to all other Metazoa (e.g. Nielsen 2001, p. 30, 506-507, but see Dunn et al. 2008, Schierwater et al. 2009, and Ryan et al. 2013 for alternative possibilities). Thus their first occurrence in the fossil record is a metric of particular interest. However, only rare occurrences of Precambrian sponges have been reported. The earliest record is of presumed sponge remains from the Doushantuo phosphates, dated around 570 Ma (Li et al. 1998), and the earliest described species is Paleophragmodictya reticulata from the ?555 Ma Ediacara locality. However, sponges could have occurred earlier and not been recognised; spicules are not necessarily diagnostic, even in living sponges (Dr. Allen Collins, pers. comm.)

  • Fossils of the Twitya Formation are generally presumed to be cnidarians, or at least as metazoans of cnidarian grade. “Interpretation as colonial aggregates of prokaryotes (e.g. Nostoc-like balls) is possible but is difficult to reconcile with the morphology and relatively high relief of the remains, their occurrence at the bottom of turbidite beds, and the lack of a carbonaceous film outlining them, particularly in view of the of the fact that carbonaceous compressions are present in the formation” (Hofmann et al. 1990, p. 1202). Of principal significance is this occurrence of cnidarian-grade metazoans in pre-Varanger sediments, since the Varanger glaciation is sometimes cited as an evolutionary ‘bottleneck’ which arrested metazoan evolution. At least a dozen of the later Ediacaran genera are considered probable cnidarians.

  • One of the strongest candidates for a derived protostome among the Ediacaran taxa is the putative mollusc, Kimberella. If this taxon is indeed a mollusc, as suggested by Fedonkin & Waggoner 1997, or if the Ediacara/Zimnie Gory traces are correctly interpreted as radula scratches, we have evidence for derived protostomes at 555 Ma. Similarly, if Arkarua adami (from the Pound Subgroup, South Australia; Gehling 1987) is correctly interpreted as an echinoderm, we have evidence for a derived deuterostome of similar age. In either case, it follows that the protostome-deuterostome split must have occurred well before 555 Ma, which is in accordance with most ‘molecular clock’ studies.

  • The late Proterozoic–Cambrian ‘small shelly fauna’ (SSF) comprises millimeter-scale calcareous and phosphatic fossils that provide the earliest evidence of skeletal organisms. Some SFSs represent genuinely small organisms, while others are fragments of larger organisms. The SSF appears just before the beginning of the Cambrian, ~550 Ma, increasing in numbers and diversity towards the middle Cambrian. There is no noticable biotic turnover at the Proterozoic–Cambrian boundary. SSF deposits become less frequent towards the end of the Cambrian or early Ordovician, although there is some evidence they actually persist in sediment starved depositional settings, right through to the present day.

“In the 1970s, Ohno proposed that vertebrates arose through a process involving one or more genome-wide duplications. This hypothesis received early support from the discovery of multiple vertebrate Hox clusters compared with one invertebrate cluster and the finding of numerous vertebrate gene families with members distributed across multiple chromosomes. Further evidence came from the discovery of paralogous (that is, duplicated) blocks of linked genes on multiple chromosomes within the human genome, culminating in the discovery of widespread quadruply conserved synteny of the human genome. These studies support the so-called ‘2R’ scenario of two rounds of whole-genome duplication during vertebrate evolution” (Simakov et al. 2020, p. 820; references elided).

Simakov et al. (2020) present evidence for the remarkable idea that there were “two distinct ancient duplications based on patterns of chromosomal conserved synteny. All extant vertebrates share the first duplication, which occurred in the mid/late Cambrian by autotetraploidization (that is, direct genome doubling). In contrast, the second duplication is found only in jawed vertebrates and occurred in the mid–late Ordovician by allotetraploidization (that is, genome duplication following interspecific hybridization) from two now-extinct progenitors” (abstract).

Cambrian Radiation

The fossil record prior to about 635 million years ago is muted and intermittent. The Earth is thought to have formed around 4.5 Ga (4.5 billion years ago), the crust solidified some time after that, and life arose some further time after that. There is controversial evidence for biomolecules as early as 3.7 Ga and the oldest unequivocal fossils are dated around 3.5 Ga. Fossils become increasingly common in younger rocks, although the majority are unicellular and largely prokaryotic until ~1200 Ma (1200 million years ago; = 1.2 Ga). Very much later, around 635 Ma, contentious trace fossils – possibly tracks – suggest the possibility of higher organisms with an organisational complexity comparable to that of annelids.

Then, rather abruptly, a number of fossil assemblages appear in various localities around the world, most famously Newfoundland, the Nama Desert, Zimnie Gory, and the Ediacara Hills of South Australia, from which these fossils take their popular name: the Ediacarans. These creatures are a strange lot, having unfamiliar morphologies and cryptic affinities to known organisms, but a similar grade of organisation to cnidarians and annelids. It is possible the Ediacarans may genuinely include both cnidarians and annelids. There are also some forms which may be molluscs, or even arthropods. The various Ediacaran sites around the world have been steadily worked for the past few decades, and collectively diverse assemblages have been accumulated. In general, the rocks are coarse grained, and the fossils are preserved as low-relief impressions, providing little detail. That the assemblage is as well-known as it is, is a tribute to the tireless efforts of researchers wrestling data from unpromising material.

Equally abruptly, around the base of the Cambrian Period at 541 Ma, no more Ediacaran fossil outcrops are found. Indeed, few earliest Cambrian fossils are known at all; those that have been described are mostly assemblages of very small, tube-shaped fossils of uncertain affinity and disarticulated parts of unknown larger animals, affectionately known as the “small shelly fauna”. Then, towards the end of Age 2 and extending into Age 3, which used to be known by the far more euphonious names Tommotian and Atdabanian, occur the five great early Cambrian lagerstätten: Sirius Passet, Chengjiang, Qingjiang, Emu Bay, and the Burgess Shale. Individually, any of these fossil localities is astonishing, and collectively they provide a window into the Cambrian unparalleled in almost any other geological period. As a result of them, we know that almost every animal phylum that seems capable of leaving a fossil record was alive at that time.

This, approximately synchronous, first known appearance of numerous different animal fossils in the great Cambrian lagerstätten, has become known as the “Cambrian explosion” (or “Cambrian radiation” for those of a less histrionic disposition).

Although the particular phrase “Cambrian explosion” only came into common usage in the early to mid 1970s, the phenomenon itself has long been recognised as demanding some accommodation from evolutionary theory. Indeed, Charles Darwin himself drew attention to the matter as early as 1859, noting that it “may be truly urged as a valid argument against” his theory of evolution by means of natural selection. He speculated that “before the lowest [Cambrian] stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably far longer than, the whole interval from the [Cambrian] age to the present day; and that during these vast, yet quite unknown, periods of time, the world swarmed with living creatures” (p. 307). Today we know that was certainly the case. Nevertheless, it still appears as if a genuinely rapid diversification of form did occur among the Metazoa (“animals”) during the Cambrian. During this event, as already noted, most extant body plans “suddenly” appear in the fossil record. “Definitive representatives of all readily fossilizable animal phyla (with the exception of bryozoans) have been found in Cambrian rocks, as have representatives of several soft-bodied phyla” (Wray et al. 1996, quoting Valentine et al. 1991). By way of contrast, “it appears that no [new] phylum-level body plans have arisen in the animal kingdom in the last 500 million years” (Arthur 1997, p. 7).

However, there has long been debate about whether to interpret this phenomenon literally, that is, to infer that the numerous, different animal groups actually diverged within a very short space of time during the early Cambrian. That is almost certainly not the case, although, evidently, something unusual was happening at this time.

What this was, when the radiation began, and how rapidly it unfolded, are still subjects of on-going research. (Read more.)

Early Paleozoic Diversification

Trilobites

Few Paleozoic fossils are as iconic as the trilobites. This group of arthropods had its origins in the Cambrian – the earliest described species seems to be Profallotaspis jakutensis (Wood et al. 2019, p. 529) – but their major radiation occurred in the Ordovician.

“Cluster analysis grouped families according to their numbers of component genera in each of the four Ordovician stratigraphic series ... showing diversity histories of all families [Fig. 1] indicate that the trilobites form two major clusters, termed faunas. The Ibex Fauna, named for the epoch during which it flourished, is characterized by Early Ordovician dominance followed by severe diversity reductions in the later Ordovician (conforming to a null hypothesis of cohort decay). The Whiterock Fauna, named for the epoch in which it radiated rapidly, displays a contrasting pattern of minimal Early Ordovician diversity, Middle Ordovician (Whiterock) radiation, and high Late Ordovician diversity. These alternate, disjunct patterns are pervasive and represent high-level macroevolutionary trends. Surviving Silurian families constitute a subgroup of the Whiterock Fauna, termed the Silurian Fauna. No member of the Ibex Fauna survived the end of the Ordovician. In contrast, nearly three-fourths of families (74%) of the Whiterock Fauna survived, and the Whiterock Fauna accounts for all post-Ordovician trilobites, with the exception of the unclustered harpetids” (Adrain et al. 1998).

Some short-lived Early Ordovician (Tremadocian) forms preceeded the principal Ordovician groups such as Seutelluina, Phacopida and Trinucleina. These principal forms were “all highly differentiated and diverse, most of them of crypogenic origin, and surviving for various periods thereafter. It is an interesting feature of trilobite evolution that after this great burst of constructional themes in the early Ordovician very few entirely new patterns of organisation arose; afterwards evolution in trilobites was largely a matter of [variations upon the Ordovician themes]” (Clarkson 1993, pp. 373-374).

The Ordovician trilobites were more successful at exploiting new environments, notably reefs, but they too suffered a crisis, during the mass extinction at the end of the Ordovician. Some distinctive and previously successful forms such as the Trinucleoidea and Agnostoidea became extinct.

Whiterock Fauna families, and in particular Silurian Fauna groups, can generally be traced only to the Early Ordovician, and in many cases they are entirely “cryptogenetic.” These clades certainly had Cambrian forebears, but the fact that they have avoided detection is a strong indication that novel morphologies were being developed very rapidly. Of the Silurian Fauna genera present during the Llandovery epoch, 78% also originated in that epoch, which demonstrates that extinctions were followed by a rapid post-extinction “rebound.” However, once this Llandovery rebound was completed, standing diversity returned to and was maintained at pre-extinction amounts. (After Adrain et al. 1998.)



Fig. 1: Reproduction of figure 1 from Adrain et al. 1998, showing the two major clusters of Ordovician trilobite ‘fauna.’

Fish

The oldest vertebrates are Early Cambrian species are “fish-like” animals from China, undoubtedly craniates but having uncertain relationships to modern groups. The oldest armoured species (euvertebrates) are Ordovician in age. Vertebrates have their first adaptive radiation during the Silurian when jawless fish – “ostracoderms” – are dominant (after Blieck 2017).

Vertebrates underwent a major adaptive radiation during the Devonian, “when jawed species (gnathostomes) and particularly placoderms (armoured fishes), became dominant. A Lochkovian [earliest Devonian] peak of diversity is registered in various Lower Devonian series all around the Old Red Sandstone Continent and Siberia, for ostracoderms in general, and heterostracan pteraspidomorphs in particular. It occurs at different time slices in the Lochkovian, depending on the localities, and may be followed by another smaller peak in the Pragian” (Blieck 2017, Abstract).

“The rise of jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes) throughout the Devonian ... and into the post-Devonian is one of the key episodes in vertebrate evolution.... This interval encompasses well-known early diversification events, including those of Osteichthyes (bony fishes: ray-finned Actinopterygii and lobe-finned Sarcopterygii, including tetrapods), Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fishes: Elasmobranchii and Holocephalii), and Placodermi and Acanthodii (extinct groups of debated affinity to extant gnathostomes)” (Sallan & Coates 2010, p. 10131).

Early Tetrapods

“The relationship of the three living groups of sarcopterygians or lobe-finned fish (tetrapods, lungfish and coelacanths) has been a matter of debate. Although opinions still differ, most recent phylogenies suggest that tetrapods are more closely related to lungfish than to coelacanths. However, no previously known fossil taxon exhibits a concrete character combination approximating the condition expected in the last common ancestor of tetrapods and lungfish—and it is still poorly understood how early sarcopterygians diverged into the tetrapod lineage (Tetrapodomorpha) and the lungfish lineage (Dipnomorpha)” (Zhu & Yu 2002, p. 767, Abstract).

Zhu & Yu (2002) describe a new fossil sarcopterygian fish, Styloichthys changae, that “possesses an eyestalk and which exhibits the character combination expected in a stem group close to the last common ancestor of tetrapods and lungfish. Styloichthys from the Lower Devonian of China bridges the morphological gap between stem-group sarcopterygians (Psarolepis and Achoania) and basal tetrapodomorphs/basal dipnomorphs. It provides information that will help in the study of the relationship of early sarcopterygians, and which will also help to resolve the tetrapod-lungfish divergence into a documented sequence of character acquisition” (Zhu & Yu 2002, p. 767, Abstract).

The gnathostomes (jawed vertebrates) “underwent major changes over the Devonian-Mississippian divide.... Placoderms, sarcopterygians, and acanthodians are replaced by chondrichthyans, actinopterygians, and tetrapods, occupying a wider range of ecological roles and dominating all succeeding biotas.... This faunal transformation has been subjected to few analyses, and explanations have tended to focus on gradual replacement ... and competitive displacement…” (Sallan & Coates 2010, p. 10131).

Colonisation of the Land

Plant life

Colonisation of the land by plants occurred in stages. The first, a bryophytic phase, lasting from the Ordovician to the Early Devonian, is evidenced by fossil spores and cuticles.

Next was the first major diversification of land plant life, such as rhyniophytes, zosterophylls, drepanophycaleans, lycophytes, trimerophytes, and (in the southern hemisphere) Baragwanathia, beginning as early as Late Ludlow (Late Silurian) in Australia through Gedinnian (Early Devonian) on Laurentia.

“Throughout Silurian times, only small rhyniophytes (or rhyniophytoids) and lycophytes are known…. Remarkably, even in these early phases of their evolution, plants had an almost worldwide distribution with records from North and South America, Europe, Africa, central Asia, China and Australia, presumably reflecting the wide dispersal potential of their spores and the lack of any competition. The global composition of these floras also appears to be fairly uniform, although this may in part be due to the problems of differentiating biological species within the plexus of these morphologically very simple plants” (Cleal & Thomas 2009, p. 203).

The first major diversification of land plant life, such as rhyniophytes, zosterophylls, drepanophycaleans, lycophytes, trimerophytes, and (in the southern hemisphere) Baragwanathia (Fig. 2, right), began as early as Late Ludlow (Late Silurian) in Australia through Gedinnian (Early Devonian) on Laurentia. Plants of this “rhyniophytoid phase” were small vascular plants having an axial organisation and terminal sporangia such as Cooksonia.

Cooksonia, the early or even primordial land plant, apparently played a key role: it has been described from a number of regions, ranges widely from the Silurian to the early Devonian, and is represented by several species such as C. pertoni, C. paranensis, C. banksii, and doubtfully C. cambrensis, C. hemisphaerica (Gonez and Gerrienne 2010a) with many other specimens having been described in open nomenclature. Cooksonia also occupies a special position in the colonization of terrestrial habitats, which is a major aspect of early plant research based on broad studies of associations, their successions and distributions (e.g. Edwards & Wellman 2001; Kenrick et al. 2012). This complex paleoecological approach has attracted considerable attention over the past two decades” Kraft et al. 2019, p. 144).

Kraft et al. 2019 envisage an “Initial Plant Diversification and Dispersal Event” to be one of the key steps in global terrestrialization. This first significant diversification and dispersal episode of vascular plants, which occurred in the Prídolí (latest Silurian) in several paleoregions representing wide paleolatitude and paleoclimatic ranges, such as Avalonia, Laurentia, Baltica, Gondwana, South and North China and Kazakhstania (e.g., Edwards & Wellman 2001, Wellman et al. 2013, and other references in Kraft et al. 2019).

(2)  
Fig. 2: Cooksonia cf. hemisphaerica, left, and Baragwanathia brevifolia (Kraft et al. 2019, fig. 4).

Arthropods

The earliest evidence for terrestrial activity by animals is provided by trace fossils. Among the oldest are Late Cambrian to no younger than Arenig (Early Ordovician) tracks made by multiple ~50 cm-sized, many legged animals preserved in an eolian sandstone in the Nepean Formation (Potsdam Group) near Kingston, Ontario. However, these track-makers were probably amphibious arthropods – possibly euthycarcinoids – which only left the sea for a limited time, rather than fully terrestrial animals (MacNaughton et al. 2002).

Caradocian (Ordovician) trackways attributed to the ichnogenera Diplichnites and Diplopodichnus occur in the Borrowdale Volcanic Group of northwestern England. Such traces are consistent with tracks made by modern millipedes, although it is not possible to be certain that the trace fossils were left by fully terrestrial animals (Johnson et al. 1994).

Meandering, sub-vertical burrows in an Upper Ordovician paleosol from Pennslyvania show bilaterally symmetrical backfilling resembling that found today in burrows made in decaying wood by some millipedes. Again it is impossible to confidently assign these burrows to millipedes or even to arthropods, but subaerial burrowing is strong evidence for a fully terrestrial habit by some animal.

The earliest terrestrial body fossils are unassignable fragments from the Llandovery (Lower Silurian) Tuscarora Formation near Millerstown, Pennslyvania. Acid digestion of rock samples has recovered pieces of bristles or setae which may be arthropodan although they do not appear to be hollow, as are nearly all arthropod setae. Annelid setae are not hollow (Gray & Boucot 1994).

The earliest identifiable terrestrial body fossils are arthropod fragments from the Late Silurian. However, these organisms possessed sensory and respiratory structures fully adapted for life on land, indicating an earlier history of terrestrial habituation that has not yet been found.

In contrast to megascopic plants, which appear to have colonized the land only once, many animal groups made the transition to terrestrial existence independently and overcame the problems of water relations in different ways. Early evidence for terrestrial animals is sparse, but by the Early Devonian exquisitely preserved arthropod faunas are known from several localities in North America, Germany and the United kingdom. These faunas document the appearance of diverse arthropod communities including centipedes, millipedes, trigonotarbids and their living relatives spiders, pseudoscorpians, mites (orbatids and endeostigmatids), arthropleurids (extinct arthropods), archaeognathans (primitive wingless insects), collembolans and possibly bristletails. Available evidence indicates that these animals were mainly predators and detritivores and, until the appearance of vertebrate herbivores in the latest Palaeozoic, most energy flow into animal components of early terrestrial ecosystems was probably through the decomposer pathway rather than direct herbivory. Indirect evidence for herbivory comes from wound responses in the tissues of some fossil plants, and perhaps also from fossil faecal pellets containing abundant spores (abridged from Kenrick & Crane 1997, p. 38).

Tetrapods

“The fossil record of early tetrapods has been increased recently by new finds from the Devonian period and mid–late Early Carboniferous period. Despite this, understanding of tetrapod evolution has been hampered by a 20-million-year gap (‘Romer’s Gap’) that covers the crucial, early period when many key features of terrestrial tetrapods were acquired” (Clack 2002b, p. 72). “This period between the end Devonian and the mid-Viséan represents the time when tetrapods underwent a major diversification and acquired true terrestriality” (Clack & Finney 1999).

“The first half of the Mississippian or Early Carboniferous (Tournaisian to mid-Viséan), an interval of about 20 million years, has become known as “Romer’s Gap” because of its poor tetrapod record. Recent discoveries emphasise the differences between pre-“Gap” Devonian tetrapods, unambiguous stem-group members retaining numerous “fish” characteristics indicative of an at least partially aquatic lifestyle, and post-“Gap” Carboniferous tetrapods, which are far more diverse and include fully terrestrial representatives of the main crown-group lineages. It seems that “Romer’s Gap” coincided with the cladogenetic events leading to the origin of the tetrapod crown group” (Chen et al. 2018, Abstract).

The only articulated skeleton of a tetrapod yet found from the Tournaisian epoch (354–344 Ma) is Pederpes, “the earliest-known tetrapod to show the beginnings of terrestrial locomotion and was at least functionally pentadactyl” (Clack 2002b, Abstract). With its later American sister-genus, Whatcheeria, it represents the next most primitive tetrapod clade after those of the Late Devonian, bridging the temporal, morphological and phylogenetic gaps that have hitherto separated Late Devonian and mid-Carboniferous tetrapod faunas” (Clack 2002b, p. 72).

Chen et al. (2018) describe a partial right jaw ramus of a new tetrapod, Tantallognathus woodi, from the late Tournaisian or early Viséan of Scotland. The large and robust jaw exhibits a distinctive combination of characters. A phylogenetic analysis places Tantallognathus in the upper part of the tetrapod stem group, above Pederpes and Whatcheeria.

Sallan & Coates (2010) explain Romer’s Gap as the post-extinction trough following the Hangenberg extinction at the end of the Devonian. “Corresponding lack of Tournaisian material from other terrestrial groups (e.g., insects) supports this conclusion..., and Devonian levels of faunal disparity are only regained in the Serpukhovian.... Even late Mississippian assemblages of vertebrate species from both sides of the newly formed Pangaea are strikingly similar (e.g., Bearsden and Bear Gulch localities...), likewise for associated invertebrate assemblages…. Extinctions remove characters from the pool of varying morphologies.... For example, digit number is known to be variable among late Famennian tetrapods ... but stabilizes with a maximum limit of five among all later forms” (Sallan & Coates 2010, p. 10134, 10135).

“Traditionally the name ‘Amphibia’ has been employed more broadly to refer to all tetrapods that are not amniotes, but this is rather misleading because most of these forms were not similar to extant amphibians and may have been different biologically. Among the Paleozoic and early Mesozoic ‘amphibians,’ most authors have distinguished two principal groups – Lepospondyli and Temnospondylli. The exclusively Paleozoic lepospondyls comprise a heterogeneous assemblage of small forms with holospondylous vertebrae. By contrast, temnospondyls are a remarkably diverse group that ranged from the Mississippian to the Early Cretaceous and include the stem forms of at least frogs and salamanders. … During the Triassic, temnospondyls were represented by a variety of lineages and were semi-aquatic or fully aquatic carnivores in many ecosystems. Most Triassic temnospondyls are referred to the Stereospondlyi,” a subgroup of which is the Capitosauroidea. Capitosauroids “include often large forms with a dorsoventrally flattened truck and head, and an elongated snout, which lends them a superficially crocodile-like appearance. A characteristic feature … is the presence of a deeply incised otic notch, or opening (which presumably accommodated the tympanic membrane), along the posterior margin of the skull roof” (Sues & Fraser 2010, p. 12).

Early tetrapods evolved the amniote egg, thereby becoming truly terrestrial.

Close of the Paleozoic

End Permian Extinction Event

Of all Phanerozoic mass extinctions, the event at the end of the Permian was by far the most profound. At this time something like 60% of all species (and perhaps 90% of all marine forms) went extinct. The last few trilobites disappeared during this event although, as a class, they were already a very impoverished group by then.

No clear explanation is available and it is possible that the extinction was an emergent consequence of many factors which, individually, may have been too subtle to leave much evidence.

“Fundamental to understanding its cause is determining the tempo and duration of the extinction. Uranium/lead zircon data from Late Permian and Early Triassic rocks from south China place the Permian-Triassic boundary at 251.4 ± 0.3 million years ago. Biostratigraphic controls from strata intercalated with ash beds below the boundary indicate that the Changhsingian pulse of the end-Permian extinction, corresponding to the disappearance of about 85 percent of marine species, lasted less than 1 million years. At Meishan, a negative excursion in d13C [see Fig. 3] at the boundary had a duration of 165,000 years or less, suggesting a catastrophic addition of light carbon” (Bowring et al. 1998, p. 1039).

However, widespread “basaltic volcanism occurred in the region of the West Siberian Basin in central Russia during Permo-Triassic times. New 40Ar/39Ar age determinations on plagioclase grains from deep boreholes in the basin reveal that the basalts were erupted 249.4 ± 0.5 million years ago. This is synchronous with the bulk of the Siberian Traps, erupted further east on the Siberian Platform. The age and geochemical data confirm that the West Siberian Basin basalts are part of the Siberian Traps and at least double the confirmed area of the volcanic province as a whole. The larger area of volcanism strengthens the link between the volcanism and the end-Permian mass extinction” (Reichow et al. 2002, p. 1846, Abstract).

“The marine sediments of Jameson Land, East Greenland, preserve a unique record of the Permian-Triassic extinction event. High rates of sedimentation, controlled by active faulting, have produced a greatly expanded succession compared to other sections worldwide. In addition, the sediments have suffered remarkably little burial and thermal alteration and contain well preserved marine organisms and terrestrially derived plant remains. For the first time, it is possible to compare the terrestrial and marine fossil records of this extinction event using the same samples from the same sections. These studies have importance for palaeoecology as well as for correlation between marine and terrestrial sections worldwide. Marine ecosystem collapse is signalled by a sharp reduction in bioturbation, a disappearance of Permian taxa, a sharp decrease in the 13C curve (interpreted as an indication of productivity collapse) and the appearance of widespread oxygen restriction. This all occurs within approx. 50 cm at the top of the Schuchert Dal Formation. During the same interval, there is also a turnover in the terrestrial ecosystem from gymnosperm to pteridosperm dominated floras. Studies of sections in northern Italy also suggest that a similar synchronicity exists in the timing of ecosystem recovery in both marine and terrestrial realms during the late Lower Triassic” (Looy & Twitchett 1999).

“There is a widespread belief that ‘throughout their history fish have proved virtually immune to mass extinction events’” (Hallam & Wignall 1997, p. 71). During the Permian-Triassic extinction event fish diversity seems to have increased, whereas all other marine groups declined sharply. This presents an ecological problem: how can organisms at the top of a food chain survive a widespread collapse in productivity and biomass at lower trophic levels? Good Permian-Early Triassic fish faunas are known only from a few areas worldwide: Madagascar, East Greenland and Spitsbergen. One possibility is that in these areas the extinction was less severe than elsewhere and thus the food chain remained relatively intact. However, palaeoecological data from East Greenland show that conditions were just as bad here as elsewhere. Instead, it appears that fish were better preserved in the Lower Triassic than in the latest Permian. This is due to widespread benthic anoxia, high sedimentation rates and rapid concretion formation in the narrow, fault controlled basin of East Greenland. In contrast, benthic invertebrate groups show much worse preservation in the Lower Triassic than in the Late Permian (due to a dearth of silicified faunas). When the number of Lazarus taxa are taken into account, fish diversity shows a similar pattern through the Permian-Triassic interval as all other marine groups” (Twitchett 1999).

An analysis of “global Permian and Triassic plant data in a paleogeographic context show that the scale and timing of effects [on plants] varied markedly between regions” and that “the patterns are best explained by differences in geography, climate, and fossil preservation, not by catastrophic events” (Rees 2002, p. 827).


Fig. 3. Carbon isotope curve at Meishan section; from Bowring et al. 1998.

Mesozoic Developments

Plant Life

Although the Triassic flora “included various holdovers from the Paleozoic, in addition, there were many new families as well as one new order, the Bennettitales. In fact, … the Triassic vegetation can be considered a mixture of ancient and modern. Indeed, some Triassic species are considered to be members of living genera, whereas others bear no resemblance whatsoever to modern-day taxa. There was a clear distinction during the Triassic between the land floras of the northern and southern hemispheres. Certain ferns grew in both hemispheres, but in general, there were relatively few taxa common to both the north and the south. … Although angiosperms … did not exist during the early Mesozoic, there were many other Triassic and Jurassic foliage taxa that would likely have formed dense ground cover. Herbaceous seed ferns and extensive stands of horsetails and ferns were probably common. There is certainly every reason to think that open, verdant hillsides, wooded and forested slopes, and hot and steamy forests and swamps were very much part of the Triassic landscape” (Fraser & Henderson (2006), p. 53, 54-55).

Lycopods were widely distributed, but these were herbaceous taxa similar to the modern day Lycopodium rather than the large, tree-like forms (Lepidodendron etc.) of earlier periods. Equisetales (horsetails) were also smaller than their Paleozoic ancestors, although many were still respectable trees. Having declined through the Permian, Filicales (true ferns) underwent a resurgence in diversity during the Triassic, including the appearance of some modern families such as the Osmundaceae, represented by the commonly found fossil, Cladophlebis. Cycads were more widespread than today, achieving a global distribution. Another very commonly found fossil, Taenopteris, belongs to this group. Bennettitales and Gingkoales were important floral taxa. Conifers, including araucarians (a sister group to the podocarps, such as the New Zealand kauri), included both smaller shrubs and large woody trees, such as the massive tree trunks of Araucarioxylon arizonicum, the state fossil of Arizona. (Summarised from Fraser & Henderson (2006), p. 55-60.)

Early Cretaceous vegetation was broadly similar to that of Late Jurassic times, both in distribution and general composition. Low paleolatitudes at that time were arid, having desert and sub-desert conditions, and here the floras were dominated by cheirolepidiacean conifers and matoniacean ferns. Northern mid paleolatitude floras were more diverse, including ferns, bennettitaleans, cycads, conifers and some ginkgos. At higher latitudes, diversity declined again, the floras dominated by leptostrobaleans and ginkgos. Southern mid paleolatitudes were dominated by bennettitaleans and cheirolepidiacean conifers. (Adapted from Cleal & Thomas 2009.)

The most striking event in the evolution of plants during the Cretaceous was certainly the enormous radiation of angiosperms. The angiosperms (flowering plants) are the most diverse group of land plants living today, comprising some 270,000 described species – more than all other groups of land plants combined – placed in about 380 families and 83 orders (Mayr 2001, p. 64) and dominating modern plant ecosystems. “In theior rise to ecological dominance angiosperms have exhibited extraordinary developmental and evolutionary plasticity. This has resulted in overwhelming morphological diversity and a great variety of adaptive types. Angiosperms are far more diverse in vegetative form and in the structure of their reproductive organs than any other group of land plants” (Friis et al. 2011, p. 1).

The group may have evolved from either the Gnetales or possibly the Bennettitales (Willis & McElwain 2002, p. 184).

The enormous radiation of this group has largely occurred since the mid-Cretaceous, coevolving with a similar radiation of insects. However, the angiosperms must have arisen earlier: The most recent common ancestor of all living flowering plants is estimated to have existed perhaps as early as the Triassic or even the late Carboniferous (Qui et al. 1999) or, more conservatively, “between the Triassic and the Early Cretaceous (~247–136 million years ago” (Ramirez-Barahona et al. 2020). Evidence supporting the earliest date estimates is mainly provided by calibrated genetic divergence studies, though fossil angiosperm-like pollen and leaves have been found dating back to the late Triassic. Several form-species of Crinopolles-type pollen possessing a tectate wall have been described, dating to perhaps 220 Ma. The oldest leaves are somewhat younger, perhaps 210 Ma (Norian; Late Triassic), and include the problematic taxa Furcula and Sanmiguelia.

That being said, however, current orthodoxy is that the first true angiosperms evolved in the Early Cretaceous, probably in the Valanginian (~140 to ~133 Ma) or Hauterivian (~133 to ~129 Ma) ages. The oldest unequivocal angiosperm pollen grains first appear in the fossil record “during the Valanginian-Hauterivian; they spread out of the tropics in the Aptian and Albian [~125.0 to 100.5 Ma], and radiated in the Late Cretaceous” (Harris & Arens 2016, p. 640).

Some of the earliest “body” fossils are “small plants, possibly rooted aquatics or wetland herbs” (Wing 2004, p. 90). “Compression flowers in general, however, are rare, and it is usually only the large ones which are seen. Some years ago, sieving techniques used for Tertiary sediments were applied to the Cretaceous, and yielded a previously unimagined diversity of Cretaceous angiosperm flowers, from sites in North America, Sweden, Portugal, Kazachstan, and Japan. It is now becoming clear how lineages are related. The earliest pollen is 135 million years old, and many basal eudicot lineages were fully established by about 110 Ma. Insect pollination is overwhelmingly supported by the evidence, and was probably important for enhancing speciation rates. Once started, the radiation of angiosperms, especially in low latitudes, kept rising, and shows no sign of levelling off in the Tertiary” (Clarkson 1999, p. 53).

“The earliest unequivocal fossils assignable to angiosperms, probably representing small understorey plants thriving under warm climates, appear in the Early Cretaceous of northern Gondwana (~133–125 Ma), in areas roughly corresponding to the present-day Mediterranean region. Shortly thereafter, angiosperms experienced a major burst of morphological and ecological diversification, which by the middle Cretaceous (~115–100 Ma) had triggered the evolution of most extant lineages. Overwhelming palaeobotanical evidence indicates that, in many regions, the initial burst of diversification of angiosperms was not reflected in their ecological dominance” (Ramirez-Barahona et al. 2020; references elided).

“Until the 1970s not a great deal was known about fossil flowers. Since then our knowledge has grown explosively. For example, the mid-Cretaceous Archaeanthus, from Russell, Kansas, now one of the best-known early flowers, has been the subject of extensive research. The flower is borne terminally on a long axis, and the seeds can be macerated out. The stamens and tepals are known from scars, resin bodies are scattered in the fruit and tepals, and all these features, together with the morphology, indicate an evident relation to the extant Magnoliacea” (Clarkson 1999, p. 53).

Genetic evidence (Zanis et al. 2002) strongly suggests that the most ‘primitive’ (basal) living angiosperm is a little known shrub called Amborella trichopoda; a small shrub with tiny greenish-yellow flowers and red fruit, native to the South Pacific island of New Caledonia. The Nymphaeales (waterlilies and their relatives) are also contenders for the distinction of being the most basal living angiosperms.

Perhaps the most basal fossil group yet to be well-delineated within the angiosperm clade is the Archaefructaceae, a family of herbaceous aquatic plants recovered from the Lower Cretaceous or possibly uppermost Jurassic Yixian Formation of western Liaoning, China. These plants had reproductive axes that lacked petals and sepals, and bore stamens in pairs below conduplicate (sharply folded together lengthwise) carpels. One combined morphological and molecular “total evidence” analysis places the Archaefructaceae as a sister group to all extant angiosperms, including Amborella and the Nymphaeales (Sun et al. 2002, p. 900).

(4) 

Fig. 4: Amborella trichopoda. [Photograph by Tim Stephens, courtesy of the Arboretum of the University of California, Santa Cruz.]

Appearance of the Angiosperms

The angiosperms (flowering plants) are the most diverse group of land plants living today, comprising some 270,000 described species – more than all other groups of land plants combined – placed in about 380 families and 83 orders (Mayr 2001, p. 64) and dominating modern plant ecosystems. “In theior rise to ecological dominance angiosperms have exhibited extraordinary developmental and evolutionary plasticity. This has resulted in overwhelming morphological diversity and a great variety of adaptive types. Angiosperms are far more diverse in vegetative form and in the structure of their reproductive organs than any other group of land plants” (Friis et al. 2011, p. 1).

The group may have evolved from either the Gnetales or possibly the Bennettitales (Willis & McElwain 2002, p. 184).

The enormous radiation of this group has largely occurred since the mid-Cretaceous, coevolving with a similar radiation of insects. However, the angiosperms must have arisen earlier: The most recent common ancestor of all living flowering plants is estimated to have existed perhaps as early as the Triassic or even the late Carboniferous (Qui et al. 1999) or, more conservatively, “between the Triassic and the Early Cretaceous (~247–136 million years ago” (Ramirez-Barahona et al. 2020). Evidence supporting the earliest date estimates is mainly provided by calibrated genetic divergence studies, though fossil angiosperm-like pollen and leaves have been found dating back to the late Triassic. Several form-species of Crinopolles-type pollen possessing a tectate wall have been described, dating to perhaps 220 Ma. The oldest leaves are somewhat younger, perhaps 210 Ma (Norian; Late Triassic), and include the problematic taxa Furcula and Sanmiguelia.

That being said, however, current orthodoxy is that the first true angiosperms evolved in the Early Cretaceous, probably in the Valanginian (~140 to ~133 Ma) or Hauterivian (~133 to ~129 Ma) ages. The oldest unequivocal angiosperm pollen grains first appear in the fossil record “during the Valanginian-Hauterivian; they spread out of the tropics in the Aptian and Albian [~125.0 to 100.5 Ma], and radiated in the Late Cretaceous” (Harris & Arens 2016, p. 640).

Some of the earliest “body” fossils are “small plants, possibly rooted aquatics or wetland herbs” (Wing 2004, p. 90). “Compression flowers in general, however, are rare, and it is usually only the large ones which are seen. Some years ago, sieving techniques used for Tertiary sediments were applied to the Cretaceous, and yielded a previously unimagined diversity of Cretaceous angiosperm flowers, from sites in North America, Sweden, Portugal, Kazachstan, and Japan. It is now becoming clear how lineages are related. The earliest pollen is 135 million years old, and many basal eudicot lineages were fully established by about 110 Ma. Insect pollination is overwhelmingly supported by the evidence, and was probably important for enhancing speciation rates. Once started, the radiation of angiosperms, especially in low latitudes, kept rising, and shows no sign of levelling off in the Tertiary” (Clarkson 1999, p. 53).

“The earliest unequivocal fossils assignable to angiosperms, probably representing small understorey plants thriving under warm climates, appear in the Early Cretaceous of northern Gondwana (~133–125 Ma), in areas roughly corresponding to the present-day Mediterranean region. Shortly thereafter, angiosperms experienced a major burst of morphological and ecological diversification, which by the middle Cretaceous (~115–100 Ma) had triggered the evolution of most extant lineages. Overwhelming palaeobotanical evidence indicates that, in many regions, the initial burst of diversification of angiosperms was not reflected in their ecological dominance” (Ramirez-Barahona et al. 2020; references elided).

“Until the 1970s not a great deal was known about fossil flowers. Since then our knowledge has grown explosively. For example, the mid-Cretaceous Archaeanthus, from Russell, Kansas, now one of the best-known early flowers, has been the subject of extensive research. The flower is borne terminally on a long axis, and the seeds can be macerated out. The stamens and tepals are known from scars, resin bodies are scattered in the fruit and tepals, and all these features, together with the morphology, indicate an evident relation to the extant Magnoliacea” (Clarkson 1999, p. 53).

Genetic evidence (Zanis et al. 2002) strongly suggests that the most ‘primitive’ (basal) living angiosperm is a little known shrub called Amborella trichopoda; a small shrub with tiny greenish-yellow flowers and red fruit, native to the South Pacific island of New Caledonia. The Nymphaeales (waterlilies and their relatives) are also contenders for the distinction of being the most basal living angiosperms.

Perhaps the most basal fossil group yet to be well-delineated within the angiosperm clade is the Archaefructaceae, a family of herbaceous aquatic plants recovered from the Lower Cretaceous or possibly uppermost Jurassic Yixian Formation of western Liaoning, China. These plants had reproductive axes that lacked petals and sepals, and bore stamens in pairs below conduplicate (sharply folded together lengthwise) carpels. One combined morphological and molecular “total evidence” analysis places the Archaefructaceae as a sister group to all extant angiosperms, including Amborella and the Nymphaeales (Sun et al. 2002, p. 900).

Reptiles

Modern squamates (lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians) are the world’s most diverse group of tetrapods along with birds and have a long evolutionary history, with the oldest known fossils dating from the Middle Jurassic period – 168 million years ago. Megachirella wachtleri is a lepidosaurian reptile from the Middle Triassic of the Italian Alps. Simoes et al. (2018) analysed X-ray computed tomography data to re-evaluate the diapsid phylogeny and present evidence that M. wachtleri is the oldest known stem squamate. Megachirella is 75 million years older than the previously known oldest squamate fossils, partially filling the fossil gap in the origin of lizards, and indicating a more gradual acquisition of squamatan features in diapsid evolution. Divergence time estimates using relaxed combined morphological and molecular clocks show that lepidosaurs and most other diapsids originated before the Permian/Triassic extinction event, indicating that the Triassic was a period of radiation, not origin, for several diapsid lineages.

Birds

Bird origins have been famously contentious from the earliest days of evolutionary theory. The three most plausible ideas to emerge from the debate are (1) that they evolved from some unknown group of basal archosaurs, probably in the Triassic Period; (2) that they are a sister group to the Crocodylians, perhaps arising from within the sphenosuchian crocodylomorphs in the Early Jurassic; and (3) certainly the most widely held view today, for an ancestry among the theropod dinosaurs, specifically the Maniraptora, in the Middle to early Late Jurassic.

Despite intensive searching, the earliest known bird is still the famous Archaeopteryx, known from only seven skeletons and an isolated feather, all recovered from the Late Jurassic (Tithonian, ~152 to 145 Ma) Solnhofen Limestone of Germany. The small theropod dinosaur, Compsognathus, has also been recovered from the Solnhofen. This fossil record represents a difficult problem for advocates of the theropod hypothesis: birds (specifically Archaeopteryx) are supposed to be most closely related to the dromaeosaurids, which do not appear in the fossil record until Albian times (mid Cretaceous, about 110 Ma; possibly not – see Wang & Zhou 2017 and update this bit) yet Compsognathus, which is believed to have diverged from the theropod lineage long before the evolution of the dromaeosaurids, occurs alongside Archaeopteryx 40 million years earlier. At present, only the vagaries of the fossil record can be invoked to ‘explain’ the stratigraphic disjunction; our present understanding is unsatisfactory.

Birds has already evolved by the latest Jurassic, at least, so the frequently repeated talk of “protofeathers” and other clues to the origin of birds being found in Cretaceous rocks (the Jehol literature is rife with this sort of thing) is patently ridiculous. Nevertheless, birds continued to evolve throughout the Cretaceous, when many important novelties appeared.

The first known beak and pygostyle (the “parsons-nose” which is all that remains of the reptilian tail in modern birds) occur in a Chinese fossil dated at 130 Ma.

Rahonavis is a primitive bird from 80 million-year-old rocks of Madagascar. Despite being more bird-like than Archaeopteryx, raven-sized Rahonavis retains some very distinctive theropod-like features. Other small primitive birds have been found elsewhere around the world. From Mongolia comes a large flightless bird, Mononykus, with wings replaced by a pair of single-digit hands that projected forwards. Another flightless bird is known from Patagonia. A sparrow-sized bird from Spain had a more modern shoulder joint than Archaeopteryx and a perching foot but it still had teeth.

Mammals

Early mammals had a Pangean distribution, including Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia and the Americas. Mammals were presumeably abundant in the Mesozoic, though their fossil record is poor, probably due to their small size which makes the fossils fragile and difficult to find.

The earliest fossil mammals are early Mesozoic, the exact age being dependent upon which fossils one accepts as meeting the definition of ‘mammal.’ Conventionally, mammals are recognised by their jaw morphology: how the jaw articulates with the skull and incorporation of two small bones into the inner ear. In reptiles – including the mammalian ancestors – the jaw joint is hinged on two small bones; one (the quadrate) linked to the squamosal bone of the skull and the other (the articular) to the lower jaw itself (the dentary). In true mammals, the dentary is hinged directly to the squamosal; the quadrate and articular bones are incorporated into the mammals inner ear, becoming the incus and malleus respectively.

The Late Triassic morganucodontids exhibit an intermediate jaw morphology, neither completely reptilian nor yet fully mammalian: They had a jaw in which the dentary articulated with the squamosal but which still included articular and quadrate bones; these had not yet evolved to form the malleus and incus of the true mammalian inner ear. The morganucodontids are the oldest and most primitive of the triconodontans so are sometimes (e.g. Rich et al. 1996, p. 519) regarded as the first mammals.

“The Jurassic period is an important stage in early mammalian evolution, as it saw the first diversification of this group, leading to the stem lineages of monotremes and modern therian mammals. However, the fossil record of Jurassic mammals is extremely poor, particularly in the southern continents. Jurassic mammals from Gondwanaland are so far only known from Tanzania and Madagascar, and from trackway evidence from Argentina” (Rauhut et al. 2002, p. 165).

A study by Meredith et al. (2011) derived the mean date for the split between placentals and marsupials as ~190 Ma, noting that this estimate accords well with the discovery of a stem eutherian from the Jurassic reported by Luo et al. 2011.

Throughout the early Mesozoic, mammals remained small, becoming more abundant, larger, and more diverse in the Cretaceous, which may have been a time of explosive radiation of Tribosphenida – early relatives of marsupials and placentals (Rougier 2002).

“The diversity of living and extinct mammalian species is documented by the fossil record of ~220 million years and has evolved against the backdrop of radical alterations in terrestrial floras during the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution (KTR), the Cretaceous-Paleogene (KPg) mass extinction, continental rearrangements, and changes in key environmental parameters, such as average global temperature. However, the impact of these drivers on taxonomic diversification, particularly near the KPg boundary, remains controversial” (Meredith et al. 2011, p. 521). The results of the Meredith et al. (2011) study were “consistent with Benton’s hypothesis [Benton 2010] that the KTR (125 to 80 Ma), during which the angiosperm component of floras increased from 0 to 80%, was a key event in the diversification of mammals and birds” (p. 523).

“[O]ur results are consistent with the hypothesis that both the KTR and the KPg mass extinction played important roles in the early diversification and adaptive radiation of mammals. The KTR increased ecospace diversity [the reality of ‘ecospace diversity’ appears to be an unconscious assumption present throughout this paper], possibly precipitating interordinal diversification, whereas the KPg mass extinction made more of this ecospace available for mammals, promoting the emergence of crown-group orders with their distinctive morphological adaptations” (Meredith et al. 2011, p. 523).

The Cenozoic

Mammals

Whereas early placentals undoubtedly lived in the Mesozoic, the crown group radiation is thought to have occurred after the end of the Cretaceous (e.g., O’Leary et al. 2013, Halliday et al. 2017).

The analysis by Meredith et al. (2011) suggests that “only 29 to 32 mammalian lineages, nearly all of which are stem branches leading to extant orders, may have crossed the KPg boundary…. This inference is consistent with the long-fuse model of mammalian diversification ... which postulates interordinal diversification in the Cretaceous, followed by intraordinal diversification that is mostly restricted to the Cenozoic ..., although conflicts do remain with the Cretaceous eutherian fossil record” (p. 523).

The earliest stem carnivorans, the group including cats, dogs, bears and others, are the genera Ravenictis and Pristinictis, known from the earliest Paleocene, and afrotherians (the group comprising elephants, dugongs, aardvarks, among others) from the Middle Paleocene. The first chiropteran (bat) fossils – already quite highly derived, capable of true flight although not echolocation – are known from the famous, Early Eocene Green River Formation of Wyoming. The earliest lagomorphs (rabbits, hares, etc.) are known from the mid Eocene of China. (After Halliday et al. 2017.)

A study by Bininda-Emonds et al. 2007 examined relations and divergence times among all living mammalian families and concluded that there was a dramatic upturn in mammalian diversification rates during the Eocene, ~55 to 50 million years ago. This idea has been challenged, however (see Meredith et al. 2011).

Primates

“If the Cretaceous Indian genus Deccanolestes is, as some have suggested, closely related to purported euarchontans, such as nyctitheres ... or adapisoriculids ... then Deccanolestes would represent a Cretaceous occurrence of a euarchontan” (the group containing rodents and primates, among others; Halliday et al. 2017, p. 531, and references therein).

Notwithstanding, the primate record, generally, and the human record in particular, is very incomplete. The closest living relatives of primates may be the Dermoptera (colugos, arboreal gliding mammals native to Southeast Asia; suggested by genetic studies) or the clade of Dermoptera plus Chiroptera (bats; suggested by morphology). Any common ancestor to the three groups must have lived in the Cretaceous. Probable primate ancestors – genera such as Purgatorius, Plesiadapis and Phenacolemur – date from the earliest Paleogene, approximately 65 Ma. The oldest known true primates occur about 55 Ma (near the Paleocene/Eocene boundary).

Molecular evidence suggests that the evolutionary line of humans diverged from that of the other apes sometime between 10 and 5 million years ago. However, the discovery in Chad of a plausible human ancestor, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, in 6-7 million year old sediments suggests that the younger end of this range is unlikely and divergence between men and apes is older than indicated by most molecular studies. Moreover, the slightly younger Orrorin tugensis, discovered in ~6 Ma sediments from Kenya, hints at a diverse and perhaps geographically widespread homonid family tree living in the latest Miocene.

Human Origins

Origin

The first recognisable apes had evolved by about 20 Ma ago with the appearance of Dryopithecus (formerly Proconsul) africanus, which may have been ancestral to both humans and contemporary apes. A great variety of forms appeared shortly after Dryopithecus, particularly in Africa, but with a few exceptions the fossil record becomes more than usually poor between about 14 and 4 Ma ago, and little is known from this period.

Molecular evidence suggests that the evolutionary line of humans diverged from that of the other apes sometime between 10 and 5 million years ago, but this timescale has been seriously challenged by discoveries of possible human ancestors in the older half of this range. Foremost among them are the 6-7 Ma Sahelanthropus tchadensis, discovered at Toros-Menalla in Chad, which is the oldest plausible human ancestor known to date, and, not much younger, the ~6 Ma Orrorin tugensis, discovered at Lukeino in Kenya. Together, the two fossil discoveries hint at a diverse and perhaps geographically widespread homonid ancestry, and an older divergence between men and apes than is indicated by most molecular studies.

Somewhat younger are “Ardipithecus kadabba from the Middle Awash area (Ethiopia, ca. 5.5 Ma) ... followed closely in time by the early Pliocene Ardipithecus ramidus (4.4 Ma), for which a very complete skeleton is available. The geographical and chronological distribution of these taxa strongly suggests that the earliest hominins evolved from an African Miocene ape” (Almécija et al. 2013, p. 2).

“In Africa, the fossil record for hominoids between 13 and 7 million years ago is relatively sparse. This has led some authors to postulate that the hominines initially diverged in Eurasia before migrating back into Africa (Begun et al. 2003, Stewart & Disotell 1998). However, recent discoveries and a growing appreciation of later Miocene hominoid diversity in Africa make this an untenable scenario” (Harrison 2010, p. 533.)

Miocene

“A diversity of hominoids also occurred in Asia during the middle and late Miocene, extending from Indo-Pakistan to Thailand. Of these, Ankarapithecus, Sivapithecus, Lufengpithecus, Khoratpithecus, and Gigantopithecus are all likely to be closely related to the extant orangutan (Begun 2007)” (Harrison 2010, p. 533).

“Gradual cooling during the middle Miocene led to greater seasonality in western and central Europe and a shift from subtropical evergreen forests to predominantly deciduous broadleaved woodlands. This shift was accompanied by a dramatic turnover of the mammalian fauna at 9.6 million years ago, termed the Mid-Vallesian Crisis, when most hominoids became extinct (Agustí et al. 2003). About 7 to 8 million years ago, uplift of the Tibetan Plateau and increased intensity of the Asian monsoon, together with the global expansion of C4 grasses, led to a further decline in the diversity of Eurasian hominoids. By 5 million years ago, hominoids had become extinct throughout Eurasia, except for those surviving in the present-day range of Asian hominoids (orangutans and hylobatids), extending from southern China to Southeast Asia.” (Rearranged and slightly adapted from Harrison 2010, p. 533.)

Pliocene

The earliest fully bipedal human ancestor known is the 4 million year old Australopithecus afarensis, first recognised from the famous fossil known as Lucy. Subsequently, two main lines of pre-human evolution diverged: the australopithecines, which eventually became extinct, and those given the genus name Homo, beginning with an unnamed ~2.5 Ma old fossil, rapidly succeeded by Homo rudolfensis.

Quaternary

The earliest species assigned to Homo is the unnamed species appearing at the beginning of the Quaternary, approximately 2.5 million years ago. This species was rapidly succeeded by Homo rudolfensis. Then, two further species, Homo habilis and H. ergaster overlap through much of the interval 2 to 1.5 Ma; the latter seems more likely to have been the direct human ancestor.

Homo erectus is the only recognised representative of the genus between about 1.2 and 0.7 Ma; some interpretations place it on the direct ancestral line to modern humans, others consider H. ergaster to have been directly ancestral to H. heidelbergensis, which first appears about 0.6 Ma, and from there to modern H. sapiens. However, if H. erectus is not directly ancestral to H. heidelbergensis and modern man, we are left with a ~900,000 year gap in which the true intermediaries are unknown.

“The first hominin dispersal out of Africa is thought to have been when members of the species Homo erectus exited some 2 million years ago. The second wave of departures occurred when the ancestral species that eventually gave rise to Neanderthals moved into Europe around 800,000–600,000 years ago” (Delson 2019, p. 488).

This commentary may now be dated – needs checking: Anatomically modern H. sapiens first appears close to 200,000 years ago. The oldest well-dated fossils are the Omo I and Omo II fossils from Kibish, Ethiopia (McDougall et al. 2005).

“The origin and early dispersal of Homo sapiens has long been a subject of both popular and scholarly interest. It is almost universally agreed that H. sapiens (modern humans) evolved in Africa, with the earliest known fossil representatives of our species dated to around 315,000 years ago in Morocco (at a site called Jebel Irhoud) and approximately 260,000 years ago in South Africa (at Florisbad). Stone tools comparable to those found with both of these fossils have been excavated in Kenya (at Olorgesailie) and dated to about 320,000 years ago…. Many key fossil discoveries from Israel document early examples of [human] dispersals. A fossil that includes the forehead region of a skull found there, at a site called Zuttiyeh, is dated to between 500,000 and 200,000 years ago, and analysis of the fossil’s shape indicates that it is either an early Neanderthal or from a population ancestral to both Neanderthals and H. sapiens” (Delson 2019, p. 487, 488).

References

Adrain, J.M.; Fortey, R.A.; Westrop, S.R. 1998: Post-Cambrian trilobite diversity and evolutionary faunas. Science 280: 1922-1925.

Agustí, J.; Sanz de Siria, A.; Garcés, M. 2003: Explaining the end of hominoid experiment in Europe. Journal of Human Evolution 45: 145-153.

Allwood, A.C.; Walter, M.R.; Kamber, B.S.; Marshall, C.P.; Burch, I.W. 2006: Stromatolite reef from the Early Archaean era of Australia. Nature 441: 714-718.

Almécija, S.; Tallman, M.; Alba, D.M.; Pina, M.; Moyà-Solà, S.; Jungers, W.L. 2013: The femur of Orrorin tugenensis exhibits morphometric affinities with both Miocene apes and later hominins. Nature Communications 4:2888: 1-12.

Anders, E. 1989: Pre-biotic organic matter from comets and asteroids. Nature 342: 255-257.

Arthur, W. 1997: The Origin of Animal Body Plans. Cambridge University Press: 1-338.

Begun D.; Güleç, E.; Geraads, D. 2003: Dispersal patterns of Eurasian hominoids: Implications from Turkey. Deinsea 10: 23-39.

Begun, D.R. 2007: 4 Fossil record of Miocene hominoids. In Henke, W.; Tattersall, I. 2007: Handbook of paleoanthropology. Springer : 921-977.

Benton, M.J. 2010: The origins of modern biodiversity on land. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, series B: Biological Sciences 365: 3667-3679.

Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P.; Cardillo, M.; Jones, K.E.; MacPhee, R.D.E.; Beck, R.M.D.; Grenyer, R.; Price, S.A.; Vos, R.A.; Gittleman, J.L.; Purvis, A. 2007: The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 446: 507-512.

Blieck, A. 2017: Heterostracan vertebrates and the Great Eodevonian Biodiversification Event — an essay. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments 97 (3): 375-390.

Bowring, S.A.; Erwin, D.H.; Jin, Y.G.; Martin, M.W.; Davidek, K.; Wang, W. 1998: U/Pb zircon geochronology and tempo of the end-Permian mass extinction. Science 280: 1039-1045.

Brack, A. 2001: Origin of life. Nature Encyclopedia of Life Sciences.

Brusatte, S. 2018: Dinosaurs: From Humble Beginnings to Global Dominance. Scientific American 23 May: 20-25.

Chen, D.; Alavi, Y.; Brazeau, M.D.; Blom, H.; Millward, D.; Ahlberg, P.E. 2018: A partial lower jaw of a tetrapod from “Romer’s Gap”. Earth and Environmental Sciences Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 108: 55-65.

Chen, Z.; Zhou, C.; Yuan, X.; Xiao, S. 2019: Death march of a segmented and trilobate bilaterian elucidates early animal evolution. Nature Letters.

Clack, J.A. 2002: An early tetrapod from ‘Romer’s Gap’. Nature 418: 72-76.

Clack, J.A.; Finney, S.M. 1999: The First Articulated Tournaisian Tetrapod: an Update. Palaeontological Association 43rd Annual Meeting, University of Manchester, 19-22 December 1999 (Poster Presentation).

Clarkson, E.N.K. 1993: Invertebrate Paleontology and Evolution (third edition). Chapman and Hall.

— 1999: The Origin of Flowers - Association Annual Address. The Palaeontological Association Newsletter 41: 53.

Cleal, C.J.; Thomas, B.A. 2009: An Introduction to Plant Fossils. Cambridge University Press: 1-248.

Darwin, C.R. 1859: On the origin of species by means of natural selection [first edition]. John Murray, London: 1-490.

Delson, E. 2019: An early modern human outside Africa. Nature 571: 487-488.

Dunn, C.W.; Hejnol, A.; Matus, D.Q.; Pang, K.; Browne, W.E.; Smith, S.A.; Seaver, E.; Rouse, G.W.; Obst, M.; Edgecombe, G.D.; Sørensen, M.V.; Haddock, S.H.D.; Schmidt-Rhaesa, A.; Okusu, A.; Kristensen, R.M.; Wheeler, W.C.; Martindale, M.Q.; Giribet, G. 2008: Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature Letters 452: 745-749.

Edwards, D.; Wellman, C.H. 2001: Embryophytes on land: the Ordovician to Lochkovian (Lower Devonian) record. In Gensel, P.G.; Edwards, D. (ed.) 2001: Plants Invade the Land. Evolutionary and Environmental Perspectives. Columbia University Press : 3-28.

Fedonkin, M.A.; Waggoner, B. M. 1997: The Late Precambrian Fossil Kimberella is a Mollusc-Like Bilaterian Organism. Nature 388: 868-871.

Fraser, N.; Henderson, D. (illus.) 2006: Dawn of the dinosaurs. Indiana University Press: 1-307.

Friis, E.M.; Crane, P.R.; Pedersen, K.R. 2011: Early flowers and angiosperm evolution. Cambridge University Press: 1-585.

Gehling, J.G. 1987: Earliest known echinoderm – a new Ediacaran fossil from the Pound Subgroup of South Australia. Alcheringa 11: 337-345.

Gonez, P.; Gerrienne, P. 2010a: A new definition and a lectotypification of the genus Cooksonia Lang 1937. Int. J. Plant Sci. 171 (2): 199-215.

Gray & Boucot 1994: Early Silurian Nonmarine Animal Remains and the Nature of the Early Continental Ecosystem. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 38: 303-328.

Hallam, A.; Wignall, P.B. 1997: Mass extinctions and their aftermath. Oxford University Press.

Halliday, T.J.D.; Upchurch, P.; Goswami, A. 2017: Resolving the relationships of Paleocene placental mammals. Bioogical Reviews 92: 521-550.

Harris, E.B.; Arens, N.C. 2016: A mid-Cretaceous angiosperm-dominated macroflora from the Cedar Mountain Formation of Utah, USA. Journal of Paleontology 90 (4): 640-662.

Harrison, T. 2010: Apes among the tangled branches of human origins. Science 327: 532-534.

Hedges, S.B. 2002: The origin and evolution of model organisms. Nature Reviews - Genetics 3: 838-849.

Hofmann, H.J.; Narbonne, G.M.; Aitken, J.D. 1990: Ediacaran remains from intertillite beds in northwestern Canada. Geology 18: 1199-1202. Geology.

Holland, H.D. 1984: The chemical evolution of the atmosphere and oceans. Princeton University Press: 1-582.

Johnson, E.W.; Briggs, D.E.G.; Suthren, R.J.; Wright, J.L.; Tunnicliffe, S.P. 1994: Non-Marine Arthropod Traces from the Subaerial Ordovician Borrowdale Volcanic Group, English Lake District. Geol. Mag. 131: 395-406. .

Kenrick, P.; Crane, P.R. 1997: The origin and early evolution of plants on land. Nature 389: 33-39.

Kenrick, P.; Wellman, C.H.; Schneider, H.; Edgecombe, G.D. 2012: A timeline for terrestrialization: consequences for the carbon cycle in the Palaeozoic. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 367 (1588): 519-536.

Kirschvink, J.L.; Gaidos, E.J.; Bertani, E.; Beukes, N.J.; Gutzmer, J.; Maepa, L.N.; Steinberger, R.E. 2000: Paleoproterozoic snowball Earth: Extreme climatic and geochemical global change and its biological consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97 (4): 1400-1405.

Knoll, A.H. 1996: Chapter 4. Archean and Proterozoic Paleontology. In Jansonius, J.; McGregor, D.C. (eds.) 1996: Paleontology: Principles and Applications. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation, v. 1, pp. 51-80. 1: 51-80.

Kraft, P.; Psenicka, J.; Sakala, J.; Frýda, J. 2019: Initial plant diversification and dispersal event in upper Silurian of the Prague Basin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 514 (2019) 144-155.

Li, C.; Chen, J.; Hua, T. 1998: Precambrian Sponges with Cellular Structures. Science 279: 879-882.

Looy, C.V.; Twitchett, R.J. 1999: Synchronous collapse, and recovery, of the terrestrial and marine ecosystems during the Permian-Triassic interval. Palaeontological Association 43rd Annual Meeting, University of Manchester, 19-22 December 1999 (Oral Presentation).

Luo, Z.; Yuan, C.; Meng, Q.; Ji, Q. 2011: A Jurassic eutherian mammal and divergence of marsupials and placentals. Nature 476: 442-445.

MacNaughton, R.B.; Cole, Jennifer M.; Dalrymple, Robert W.; Braddy, Simon J.; Briggs, D.E.G.; Lukie, Terrence D. 2002: First steps on land: Arthropod trackways in Cambrian-Ordovician eolian sandstone, southeastern Ontario, Canada. Geology 30: 391-394.

Martin, W.F.; Sousa, F.L. 2016: Early microbial evolution: The age of anaerobes. Cold Spring Harbour Perspectives in Biology: 1-18.

Mayr, E. 2001: What evolution is. Weidenfeld & Nicolson: 1-318.

McDougall, I.; Brown, F.H.; Fleagle, J.G. 2005: Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia. Nature 433: 733-736. Nature.

Meredith, R.W.; Janečka, J.E.; Gatesy, J.; Ryder, O.A.; Fisher, C.A.; Teeling, E.C.; Goodbla, A.; Eizirik, E.; Simão, T.L.L.; Stadler, T.; Rabosky, D.L.; Honeycutt, R.L.; Flynn, J.J.; Ingram, C.M.; Steiner, C.; Williams, T.L.; Robinson, T.J.; Burk-Herrick, A.; Westerman, M.; Ayoub, N.A.; Springer, M.S.; Murphy, W.J. 2011: Impacts of the Cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science 334: 521-524.

Nielsen, C. 2001: Animal evolution: Interrelationships of the living phyla (second edition). Oxford University Press: 1-378.

O'Leary, M.A.; Bloch, J.I.; Flynn, J.J.; Gaudin, T.J.; Giallombardo, A.; Giannini, N.P.; Goldberg, S.L.; Kraatz, B.P.; Luo, Z.; Meng, J.; Ni, X.; Novacek, M.J.; Perini, F.A.; Randall, Z.S.; Rougier, G.W.; Sargis, E.J.; Silcox, M.T.; Simmons, N.B.; Spaulding, M.; Velazco, P.M.; Weksler, M.; Wible, J.R.; Cirranello, A.L. 2013: The placental mammal ancestor and the post-K-Pg radiation of placentals. Science 339: 662-667.

Qui, Y.-L.; Lee, J.; Bernasconi-Quadroni, F.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.; Zanis, M.; Zimmer, E.A.; Chen, Z.; Savolainen, V.; Chase, M.W. 1999: The Earliest Angiosperms. Nature 402: 404-407.

Ramírez-Barahona, S.; Sauquet, H.; Magallón, S. 2020: The delayed and geographically heterogeneous diversification of flowering plant families. Nature Ecology & Evolution (preprint).

Rauhut, O.W.M.; Martin, T.; Ortiz-Jaureguizar, E.; Puerta, P. 2002: A Jurassic mammal from South America. Nature 416: 165-168. Nature.

Rees, P.M. 2002: Land-plant diversity and the end-Permian mass extinction. Geology 30 (9): 827-830. Geology.

Reichow, M.K.; Saunders, A.D.; White, R.V.; Pringle, M.S.; Al'Mukhamedov, A.I.; Medvedev, A.I.; Kirda, N.P. 2002: 40Ar/39Ar Dates from the West Siberian Basin: Siberian Flood Basalt Province doubled. Science 296: 1846-1849.

Rich, P.V.; Rich, T.H.; Fenton, M.A.; Fenton, C.L. 1996: The Fossil Book. Dover.

Rosing, M.T. 1999: 13C-Depleted Carbon Microparticles in >3700-Ma Sea-Floor Sedimentary Rocks from West Greenland. Science 283: 674-676.

Rougier, G.W. 2002: Mesozoic Mammals. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0001571].

Ryan, J.F.; Pang, K.; Schnitzler, C.E.; Nguyen, A.; Moreland, R.T.; Simmons, D.K.; Koch, B.J.; Francis, W.R.; Havlak, P.; NISC Comparative Sequencing Program; Smith, S.A.; Putnam, N.H.; Haddock, S.H.D.; Dunn, C.W.; Wolfsberg, T.G.; Mullikin, J.C.; Martindale, M.Q.; Baxevanis, A.D. 2013: The genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolution. Science 342 (6164): 1242592.

Sallan, L.C.; Coates, M.I. 2010: End-Devonian extinction and a bottleneck in the early evolution of modern jawed vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107 (22): 10131-10135.

Schierwater, B.; Eitel, M.; Jakob, W.; Osigus, H.-J.; Hadrys, H.; Dellaporta, S.L.; Kolokotronis, S.-O.; DeSalle, R. 2009: Concatenated Analysis Sheds Light on Early Metazoan Evolution and Fuels a Modern “Urmetazoon” Hypothesis. PLoS Biology 7 (1): 36-44.

Simakov, O.; Marlétaz, F.; Yue, J.X.; O’Connell, B.; Jenkins, J.; Brandt, A.; Calef, R.; Tung, C.H.; Huang, T.K.; Schmutz, J.; Satoh, N.; Yu, J.K.; Putnam, N.H.; Green, R.E.; Rokhsar, D.S. 2020: Deeply conserved synteny resolves early events in vertebrate evolution. Nature Ecology and Evolution 4: 820-830.

Simões, T.R.; Caldwell, M.W.; Tałanda, M.; Bernardi, M.; Palci, A.; Vernygora, O.; Bernardini, F.; Mancini, L.; Nydam, R.L. 2018: The origin of squamates revealed by a Middle Triassic lizard from the Italian Alps. Nature 557: 706-709.

Stewart, C.; Disotell, T.R. 1998: Primate evolution - in and out of Africa. Current Biology 8 (16): R582-R588.

Sues, H.-D.; Fraser, N.C. 2010: Triassic life on land. Columbia University Press: 1-236.

Sun, G.; Ji, Q.; Dilcher, D.L.; Zheng, S.; Nixon, K.C.; Wang, X. 2002: Archaefructaceae, a new basal angiosperm family. Science 296: 899-904.

Twitchett, R.J. 1999: Palaeoecology, preservation and the myth that fish are immune to mass extinction events. Palaeontological Association 43rd Annual Meeting, University of Manchester, 19-22 December 1999 (Oral Presentation).

Ueno, Y.; Yamada, K.; Yoshida, N.; Maruyama, S.; Isozaki, Y. 2006: Ueno, Y.; Yamada, K.; Yoshida, N.; Maruyama, S.; Isozaki, Y. 2006: Evidence from fluid inclusions for microbial methanogenesis in the early Archaean era. Nature 440: 516-519. Nature.

Valentine, J.W. 1995: Late Precambrian bilaterians: Grades and clades. In Fitch, W.M.; Ayala, F.J. 1995: Tempo and mode in evolution: Genetics and paleontology 50 years after Simpson. National Academy of Sciences : 87-107.

Valentine, J.W.; Awramik, S.M.; Signor, P.W.; Sadler, P.M. 1991: The Biological Explosion at the Precambrian-Cambrian Boundary. Evolutionary Biology 25: 279.

van Zuilen, M.A.; Lepland, A.; Arrhenius, G. 2002: Reassessing the evidence for the earliest traces of life. Nature 418: 627-630. .

Wang, M.; Zhou, Z. 2017: Chapter 1. The evolution of birds with implications from new fossil evidences. In Maina, J.N. 2017: The biology of the avian respiratory system: Evolution, development, structure and function. Springer : 1-26.

Wellman, C.H.; Steemans, P.; Vecoli, M. 2013: Palaeophytogeography of Ordovician-Silurian land plants. In Harper, D.; Servais, T. (ed.) 2013: Early Palaeozoic Biogeography and Palaeogeography. Geological Society London Memoirs 38 : 461-476.

Willis, K.J.; McElwain, J.C. 2002: The evolution of plants. Oxford: 1-378.

Wing, S.L. 2004: Mass extinctions in plant evolution. In Taylor, P.D. (ed.) 2004: Extinctions in the history of life. Cambridge University Press : 61-97.

Wood, R.; Liu, A.G.; Bowyer, F.; Wilby, P.R.; Dunn, F.S.; Kenchington, C.G.; Cuthill, J.F.H.; Mitchell, E.G.; Penny, A. 2019: Integrated records of environmental change and evolution challenge the Cambrian Explosion. Nature Ecology and Evolution 3: 528-538.

Wray, G.A.; Levinton, J.S.; Shapiro, L.H. 1996: Molecular Evidence for Deep Precambrian Divergences Among Metazoan Phyla. Science 274 (5289): 568-573.

Zanis, M.J.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.S.; Mathews, S.; Donoghue, M.J. 2002: The root of the angiosperms revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99: 6848-6853.

Zhu, M.; Yu, X. 2002: A primitive fish close to the common ancestor of tetrapods and lungfish. Nature 418: 767-770.


 Peripatus Home Page pix1Black.gif (807 bytes) Evolution >> Major Events in the Evolution of Life

Hits counted from 30 Oct 2018: free hits
My Traffic Estimate