Peripatus Home Page pix1Black.gif (807 bytes) Paleontology >> Cretaceous PeriodUpdated: 16-Jan-2018 

Cretaceous Period


This page describes the Cretaceous Period, including stratigraphy, paleogeography, and famous lagerstätten, followed by a sketched outline of some of the major evolutionary events.

Keywords: Cretaceous, Cretaceous biota, fossil record, evolution



Related Topics

Further Reading

  • Ogg et al. 2008: The Concise Geologic Time Scale. Cambridge.


      Type Section

      The earliest concept of the Cretaceous was formailsed in 1822 when d’Halloy defined what he called the “Terraine Crétacé”. However, the base of the period has been modified over the years, most recently by the inclusion of the Berriasian as the lowermost stage in the Cretaceous System.

      Lower (Jurassic–Cretaceous) Boundary

      As yet there is no ratified GSSP for the base of the Berriasian Stage (= the base of the Cretaceous System) although, by common usage, it lies near the first appearance datum (FAD) of the ammonite, Berriasella jacobi. Unfortunately, this ammonite is largely confined to the Mediterranean realm, so the datum is not much use internationally.

      Upper (Cretaceous–Paleogene) Boundary

      Surely the most widely reported – and the most widely misreported – of all extinction events is that which brought the age of the dinosaurs to an end at the close of the Mesozoic: the “KT” extinction.

      Almost all of the popular and “lightly technical” literature published within the past couple of decades is filled with comet or meteorite impact theories, all ultimately traceable to the father and son team of Luis and Walter Alvarez. Indeed, there is a good body of evidence to support the contention that a large extraterrestrial impact did occur at the very end of the Cretaceous.

      However, the KT extinction is only one of several such mass extinctions in the Phanerozoic, and by no means the largest. There is no evidence of impacts associated with the other mass extinction events, and very few people try to maintain that argument today. In fact, flood volcanism is the only mechanism which really matches the data. “[L]arge continental flood-basalt volcanic events exhibit a near-perfect stage-level association with marked increases in Mesozoic and Cenozoic extinction intensity. Ten out of the 11 major flood-basalt eruption events of the last 250 million years occur during a stage that contains a local extinction peak (i.e. mass extinction). It is presently unknown whether this association is scale-dependent or extends to smaller events as well” (MacLeod 2002).

      “Everyone has a favourite theory for major extinctions, all united by the common theme of attributing dominant importance to physical factors, and playing down the importance of normal biological mechanisms. Our own work strongly favours the diversification of both mammals and birds at least 30 million years before the extinction of dinosaurs – there must be ecological consequences for small dinosaurs from this early diversification” (Penny 2002).

      If an impact was the sole cause of the KT extinctions, then that would make the KT different from the several other mass extinctions known, which is not a parsimonious conclusion. However, if an impact did occur at about that time, which seems likely, no doubt it would have added further stress to the already failing ecosystems, and possibly accelerated or even heightened the extinction event in some places.

      The GSSP for the base of the Danian Stage (= Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary) was established in 1996 in the clay layer containing the famous “K/T” iridium anomaly and nickel-rich spinels at a section of Oued Djerfane, 8 km west of El Kef, in Tunisia (see Molina et al. 2006).


      The base of the Cretaceous, though not yet formally defined, is approximately 145 Ma. The top, however, has been very accurately dated: it is 66.04 Ma.


      Major Tectonic Events

      At the beginning of the Cretaceous, Pangaea was breaking up into Laurasia in the north and Gondwana in the south. By the end of the period, at least the Gondwana continents had largely separated and were starting to migrate into their present day positions.

      [Add something about Antarctica/Australia/New Zealand breakup & set scene for Drake Passage etc. in the Paleogene]

      Land and Sea



      General Characteristics

      Major Taxa

      Plant Groups

      Perhaps the most significant evolutionary event of the middle Cretaceous was the great proliferation of angiosperms – the flowering plants. “Until the 1970s not a great deal was known about fossil flowers. Since then our knowledge has grown explosively. For example, the mid-Cretaceous Archaeanthus, from Russell, Kansas, now one of the best-known early flowers, has been the subject of extensive research. The flower is borne terminally on a long axis, and the seeds can be macerated out. The stamens and tepals are known from scars, resin bodies are scattered in the fruit and tepals, and all these features, together with the morphology, indicate an evident relation to the extant Magnoliacea.

      “Compression flowers in general, however, are rare, and it is usually only the large ones which are seen. Some years ago, sieving techniques used for Tertiary sediments were applied to the Cretaceous, and yielded a previously unimagined diversity of Cretaceous angiosperm flowers, from sites in North America, Sweden, Portugal, Kazachstan, and Japan. It is now becoming clear how lineages are related. The earliest pollen is 135 million years old, and many basal eudicot lineages were fully established by about 110 Ma. Insect pollination is overwhelmingly supported by the evidence, and was probably important for enhancing speciation rates. Once started, the radiation of angiosperms, especially in low latitudes, kept rising, and shows no sign of levelling off in the Tertiary” (Clarkson 1999, p. 53).

      Major Evolutionary Events

      Appearance of the Angiosperms

      “Angiosperms first appeared in the fossil record as pollen during the Valanginian-Hauterivian [~139.8 to 129.4 Ma]; they spread out of the tropics in the Aptian and Albian [~125.0 to 100.5 Ma], and radiated in the Late Cretaceous” (Harris & Arens 2016, p. 640). However, the angiosperms most probably arose from the Gnetales or possibly the Bennettitales (Willis & McElwain 2002, p. 184) earlier: perhaps as early as the Triassic or even the late Carboniferous (Qui et al. 1999).

      Evidence supporting earlier dates is mainly provided by calibrated genetic divergence studies, though fossil angiosperm-like pollen and leaves have been found dating back to the late Triassic. Several form-species of Crinopolles-type pollen possessing a tectate wall have been described, dating to perhaps 220 Ma. The oldest leaves are somewhat younger, perhaps 210 Ma, and include the problematic taxa Furcula and Sanmiguelia.

      Genetic evidence (Zanis et al. 2002) strongly suggests that the most ‘primitive’ (basal) living angiosperm is a little known shrub called Amborella trichopoda. Amborella is a small shrub with tiny greenish-yellow flowers and red fruit, native to the South Pacific island of New Caledonia. The Nymphaeales (waterlilies and their relatives) are also contenders for the distinction of being the most basal living angiosperms.

      Perhaps the most basal fossil group yet to be well-delineated within the angiosperm clade is the Archaefructaceae, a family of herbaceous aquatic plants recovered from the Lower Cretaceous or possibly uppermost Jurassic Yixian Formation of western Liaoning, China. These plants had reproductive axes that lacked petals and sepals, and bore stamens in pairs below conduplicate (sharply folded together lengthwise) carpels. One combined morphological and molecular “total evidence” analysis places the Archaefructaceae as a sister group to all extant angiosperms, including Amborella and the Nymphaeales (Sun et al. 2002, p. 900).

      The enormous radiation of angiosperms has largely occurred since the mid-Cretaceous, coevolving with a similar radiation of insects. Today the angiosperms comprise some 270,000 described species, placed in about 380 families and 83 orders (Mayr 2001, p. 64).


      Yixian Formation: Cretaceous (possibly some latest Jurassic? check this) Sihetun, Liaoning Province, China; true birds, dinosaurs, and several of the so-called ‘feathered dinosaurs’ [check if this is not the same as the previous entry]

      Jehol Group: Early Cretaceous Northeastern China; finds include the famous “feathered” dinosaurs, early birds, putative basal angiosperms, and primitive mammals. Detailed soft-tissue preservation of organisms is known.

      Las Hoyas: Located in Cuenca, Spain; Barremian in age. Most of the skeletal fossils appear articulated, and the exceptional preservation of them has allow to study the fossils in detail, obtaining information not available in other fossil sites.

      Hell Creek Formation: Montana and the Dakotas; non-marine fluvial channel-fill and floodplain deposits, primarily sandstone, siltstone and mudstone; diachronously overlain by lignites; almost entirely Late Cretaceous but in some places earliest Paleogene at the very top; iridium found in some of the overlying lignites may be related to the “K/T” iridium anomaly; dinosaurs have been known from the Hell Creek Formation since at least Barnum Brown’s AMNH expedition of 1902; diverse assemblage of theropods, ornithopods, pachycephalosaurs, ankylosaurs and ceratopsids, including the type and a few other specimens of Tyrannosaurus rex. See Lofgren 1997.

      Pierre Shale: Late Cretaceous (Campanian) North Dakota, USA; arthropods, vertebrates, including mosasaurs

      Hajoula Limestone: Cretaceous Lebanon; sublithographic limestone; fossil arthropods and fish

      Sierra de Montsech: Cretaceous Spain; fossil spiders, insects, crustaceans and vertebrates; see Selden 1989, 1990.

      Santana Formation: This spectacular locality is one of the most prolific sources of Early Cretaceous fish fossils. It is located in north east Brazil at the foot of Araripe Plateau, on the border of Ceará State. The fossils occur in shales, thin limestone bands, and commonly in rounded calcareous concretions. The site is most famous for fossil fish, but arthropods, molluscs, dinosaurs and pterosaurs, as well as some plants are also known.


      Surely the most widely reported – and in the lay media, at least, the most widely misreported – of all extinction events is that which brought the age of the dinosaurs to an end at the close of the Maastrichtian: the “K/T” extinction.

      The exact timing and nature of the end-Cretaceous mass-extinction event is famously contentious, so let us be clear about two things right from the outset: First, a bolide did strike the Earth at the end of the period. In fact the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary is defined by this event, so any suggestion that the impact occurred before or after the end of the Cretaceous is simply nonsensical. But, second, the almost unimaginably vast Deccan Traps volcanism was in full swing at the same time. Both of these events inevitably influenced the climate, the atmosphere, and life, to a great degree. One may resonably argue about which event had the most influence over a particular group of organisms at a particular place and time, but to adopt one or other phenomenon as a complete explanation for the mass extinction, to the outright exclusion of the other, strikes me as ideological. That is not science.

      “The idea of mass extinctions of life, traditionally by great floods, still has a strong hold on western imagination. Everyone has a favourite theory for major extinctions, all united by the common theme of attributing dominant importance to physical factors, and playing down the importance of normal biological mechanisms. Our own work strongly favours the diversification of both mammals and birds at least 30 million years before the extinction of dinosaurs – there must be ecological consequences for small dinosaurs from this early diversification” (Penny 2001). Fossil evidence also supports a progressive change in the composition of mammal communities across the K-T boundary, although dating uncertainties have complicated any simple interpretation of this data (e.g. Lofgren 1995).

      “Recent field and laboratory investigations have established that the latest Cretaceous (i.e. Campanian-Maastrichtian) sedimentary succession exposed within the James Ross Basin, Antarctica is in excess of 2 km in total thickness. Comprising essentially fine-grained, shallow-water, volcaniclastic rocks that are in places intensely fossiliferous, it represents one of the best opportunities to investigate palaeobiological and palaeoenvironmental changes leading up to the K-T boundary anywhere in the southern hemisphere. The exceptionally early extinction patterns of the inoceramid bivalves and belemnites can be confirmed, but it is apparent that other key groups such as the ammonites and trigoniid bivalves go right up to the boundary itself. Studies throughout the 1000 m thick Maastrichtian sequence indicate that, although molluscan assemblages are abundant, they are never particularly diverse. The benthic element has a distinctly temperate aspect and there is both sedimentological and palaeontological evidence to suggest that it was subjected to periodic intervals of reduced oxygen levels. The comparatively small, but nevertheless still abrupt, extinction event at the end of the Cretaceous in Antarctica may well have been buffered to some extent by both the high-latitude position and unusual sedimentological setting of the basin” (Crame 1999).

      A number of authorities have reported multiple iridium spikes in the vicinity of the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary (Ganapathy et al. 1981; Donovan et al. 1988; Graup & Spettel 1989; Bhandari et al. 1995, 1996; Zhao et al. 2002). These observations do not fit comfortably with the theory of a single, massive bolide impact being largely responsible for numerous end-Cretaceous phenomena. In the Nanxiong Basin, China, the evidence suggests that “the K/T event was not marked by an instantaneous geochemical environmental change, but stretched out over a considerable time” (Zhao et al. 2002, p. 10).

      New Zealand Occurrences

      For most of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic, the rocks which would become the basement rocks of the Zealandia continent formed part of the Pacific margin of Gondwana, flanking Australia and Antarctica (Edbrooke 2017; Strogen et al. 2017). During this time, the Zealandia basement developed mainly by subduction-driven, episodic accretion.

      “In an initial period of growth, from Cambrian to Carboniferous time, the oldest sedimentary rocks known in mainland New Zealand were deposited and acreted…. Intrusion of granitic rocks occurred intermittently but mainly during Late Devonian and Early Carboniferous time” (Edbrooke 2017, p. 31).

      Subduction at the Gondwana margin ended in late Early Cretaceous time, about 105 Ma. Following this, a period of extensional tectonics led to crustal thinning and the development of rift basins. By about 85 Ma, a margin-parallel rift basin opened completely, allowing inundation by what would become the Tasman Sea and Southwest Pacific Basin. Seafloor spreading and the production of new oceanic crust were well established by 80 Ma, as Zealandia drifted further away from Gondwana. (After Edbrooke 2017, p. 31.)


      Bhandari, A.; Shukla, P.N.; Ghevariya, Z.G.; Sundaram, S.M. 1995: Impact did not trigger Deccan volcanism: Evidence from Anjar K/T boundary layer in Deccan intertrappean sediments. Geophysics Research Letters 22: 433-436. Geo Res Lett.

      — 1996: K/T boundary layer in Deccan intertrappean at Anjar, Kutch. In Ryder, G. et al. (eds.) 1996: The Cretaceous-Tertiary event and other catastrophes in Earth history . Geological Society of America Special Paper 307. : 417-424.

      Clarkson, E.N.K. 1999: The Origin of Flowers - Association Annual Address. The Palaeontological Association Newsletter Number 41, p. 53. .

      Crame, A. 1999: Changes in molluscan faunas across the K-T boundary in Antarctica. Palaeontological Association 43rd Annual Meeting, University of Manchester, 19-22 December 1999 (Oral Presentation).

      d’Halloy, J.G.J.d’O. 1822: Observations sur un essai de cartes géologiques de la France, des Pays-Bas, et des contrées voisines. Annales de Mines 7: 353-376.

      Donovan, A.D.; Baum, G.R. et al. 1988: Sequence stratigraphic setting of the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in Central Alabama. In Wilgus, C.K. et al. (eds.) 1988: Sea-level changes - An integrated approach. Soc. Econ. Paleontol. Mineralog. Special Publication 42. : 299-307.

      Edbrooke, S.W. 2017: The geological map of New Zealand. GNS Science Geological Map 2: 1-183.

      Ganapathy, R.; Gartner, S.; Jiang, M. 1981: Iridium anomaly at the Creataceous-Tertiary boundary in Texas. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 54: 393-396. E Pl Sci Lett.

      Graup, G.; Spettel, B. 1989: Mineralogy and phase-chemistry of an Ir enriched pre-K/T layer from the Lattengebirge, Bavarian Alps, and significance for the KTB problem. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 95: 271-290. E Pl Sci Lett.

      Harris, E.B.; Arens, N.C. 2016: A mid-Cretaceous angiosperm-dominated macroflora from the Cedar Mountain Formation of Utah, USA. Journal of Paleontology 90 (4): 640-662.

      Lofgren, D.F. 1997: Hell Creek Formation. In Currie, P.J.; Padian, K. (eds.) 1997: Encyclopedia of dinosaurs. Academic Press: 1-869. : 302-303.

      Lofgren, D.L. 1995: The Bug Creek Problem and the Cretaceous-Tertiary Transition at McGuire Creek, Montana. University of California Press.

      Mayr, E. 2001: What evolution is. Weidenfeld & Nicolson: 1-318.

      Molina, E.; Alegret, L.; Arenillas, I.; Arz, J.A.; Gallala, N.; Hardenbol, J.; von Salis, K.; Steurbaut, E.; Vandenberghe, N.; Zaghbib-Turki, D. 2006: The Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the base of the Danian Stage (Paleocene, Paleogene, “Tertiary”, Cenozoic) at El Kef, Tunesia - Original definition and revision. Episodes 29: 263-273.

      Ogg, J.G.; Ogg, G.; Gradstein, F.M. 2008: The Concise Geologic Time Scale. Cambridge: 1-177.

      Penny, D. 2001: Molecular Evolution: Introduction. Nature Encyclopedia of Life Sciences [doi:10.1038/npg.els.0001701].

      Qui, Y.-L.; Lee, J.; Bernasconi-Quadroni, F.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.; Zanis, M.; Zimmer, E.A.; Chen, Z.; Savolainen, V.; Chase, M.W. 1999: The Earliest Angiosperms. Nature 402: 404-407.

      Selden, P.A. 1989: Orb-weaving spiders in the early Cretaceous. Nature 340: 711-713.

      — 1990: Lower Cretaceous spiders from Sierra de Montsech, northeast Spain. Paleontology 33: 257-285.

      Strogen, D.P.; Seebeck, H.; Nicol, A.; King, P.R. 2017: Two-phase Cretaceous–Paleocene rifting in the Taranaki Basin region, New Zealand; implications for Gondwana breakup. Journal of the Geological Society, London 174: 929-946.

      Sun, G.; Ji, Q.; Dilcher, D.L.; Zheng, S.; Nixon, K.C.; Wang, X. 2002: Archaefructaceae, a New Basal Angiosperm Family. Science, 296: 899-904. Science.

      Zanis, M.J.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.S.; Mathews, S.; Donoghue, M.J. 2002: The root of the angiosperms revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99: 6848-6853. PNAS.

      Zhao, Z.; Mao, X.; Chai, Z.; Yang, G.; Kong, P.; Ebihara, M.; Zhao, Z. 2002: A possible causal relationship between the extinction of dinosaurs and K/T iridium enrichment in the Nanxiong Basin, South China: evidence from dinosaur eggshells. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 178: 1-17.

       Peripatus Home Page pix1Black.gif (807 bytes) Paleontology >> Cretaceous Period

      Hits counted from :