Peripatus Home Page pix1Black.gif (807 bytes) Paleontology >> ChengjiangUpdated: 04-Dec-2018 

Chengjiang


Abstract

This page describes the Cambrian age Chengjiang lagerstätte, and some of the taxa reported from there.

Introduction

 
 

Related Topics


Further Reading

  • The crucible of creation (Conway Morris 1998a)
  • The Cambrian fossils of Chengjiang, China: The flowering of early animal life (Hou et al. 2007)
       
       

      Locality

      Placeholder

      MAP/

      Stratigraphy

      The Chengjiang fauna derives from the long-known Qiongzhusi Formation (syn. “Chiungchussu”) of the Qiongzhusi Stage of the late Early Cambrian (see Brasier 1989, pp. 40-41 for additional reading), located near the western margin of the Southwest China Platform [→ sidebar]. The sediments are finely laminated mudstones, formed in an outer shelf detrital belt, in quiet water environments. The frequency of macrobenthos suggests that the water was relatively well oxygenated, although bioturbation is sparse so that possibly only the uppermost layer at the sediment surface was oxygenated.

      “In eastern Yunnan ... the uppermost part of what is thought to be Precambrian has few if any fossils. Beginning in the earliest Cambrian, shelly elements first appear, then the skin of many unknown types of animals, clearly different from the trilobites and other fossils found in younger rocks. The shelly elements are now known as ‘small shelly fossils.’ The Lower Cambrian biostratigraphy in this area is based mainly on the succession of small shelly fossils at the base of the Lower Cambrian and on the succession of trilobite assemblages in the sequence above. As many as 3 small skeletal fossil biozones (or assemblages) and 11 trilobite biozones are used to divide the Lower Cambrian in this area and elsewhere on the Southwest China Platform. ... The Abadiella Biozone forms the oldest trilobite zone in the Cambrian of China. It is succeeded by the Eoredlichia Biozone, which contains the soft-bodied Chengjiang fauna. The soft-bodied Chengjiang fossils thus occur ... low down in the Lower Cambrian” (Hou et al. 1999, p. 166).

      The Chengjiang fauna occurs about 25 m above the earliest trilobites, Parabadiella, found in this area and on the Yangtze Platform. These are most probably coeval with the late Atdabanian trilobites of the Siberian Platform.

      “The western part of the Platform is different from the eastern part in terms of both sedimentary facies and biofacies. In the former, the Lower Cambrian starts with dolomites and phosphorites, with an abundance of small skeletal fossils, succeeded by detrital rocks bearing a diversity of trace fossils and, ultimately, an abundance of bradoriid arthropods and redlichid trilobites. In the latter, on the other hand, the Lower Cambrian is mainly composed of detrital rocks intercalated with limestone and its fauna is characterized mainly by protolenid and eodiscid trilobites; a few fossils similar to the Chengjiang Lagerstätte have also been found. The Chengjiang fauna probably lived in a tropical sublittoral sea” (Hou et al. 1999, p. 168).

      Taphonomy

      “The preservation of non-mineralized organismal parts probably resulted from repeated rapid burial events that prevented the bodies from destruction by currents, bioturbation and other biotic activities such as by scavengers and carnivores. Burial is also thought responsible for absence of sulphate reduction which apparently was low so that the soft-parts were preserved in a number of different layers in the formation. Well developed anoxic conditions are reflected by several layers with carbon-rich deposits in the Qiongzhusi Formation. These conditions probably led to frequent mass mortalities which may have played a significant role in the soft-part preservation” (International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy).

      Significance

      Lower Cambrian soft-tissue fossils from Chengjiang, near the city of Kunming in Yunnan Province, China, preserve a diverse biota dated approximately 515 to 520 Ma, some 25 Ma after the beginning of the Cambrian and pre-dating the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale by perhaps 10 to 15 Ma (Martin et al. 2000).

      The soft-bodied fossils include diverse algae, medusiform metazoans, chondrophorines, sponges, chancelloriids, ctenophores, cnidarians, nematomorphs, priapulid worms, hyoliths, possible ectoprocts, inarticulate brachiopods, annelid-like animals, anomalocharidids, onychophorans, a wide variety of other arthropods, including trilobites (though few of these), echinoderms, ‘hemichordates’ and probable early chordates, as well as numerous problematical forms that cannot definitely be assigned to well established taxa. They include virtually all the groups known from the Burgess Shale and other Middle Cambrian localities, thus compressing the available time for the morphological diversification of metazoans, known as the Cambrian Explosion, to just 25 Ma or so.

      The fossils occur in rocks of the Qiongzhusi Formation, cropping out widely in eastern Yunnan Province, South China, where they have been known and studied for some time (e.g. Mansuy 1912, Wang 1941, Lu 1941, Ho 1942) and which include stratotypes for the Southwest China Platform. However, it was not until 1984 when Hou Xianguang collected a surprisingly well preserved specimen of Naraoia from Maotianshan, Chengjiang County (fig. 1), that the exceptional soft-body lagerstätte was recognised.

      “The discoveries in 1984 of the Lower Cambrian soft-bodied faunas of Sirius Passet in North Greenland and of Chengjiang in southwest China has had a much greater impact on the significance of the Burgess Shale fauna – it is no longer the sole major source of our knowledge of Cambrian animal life. The older, Sirius Passet fauna includes animals that look significantly more primitive than those in the Burgess Shale,and seems to have few animals, if any, in common. In contrast, the Chengjiang fauna has so many animals in common with the Burgess Shale that it seems to be its geographic extension. This demonstrates that the Cambrian “evolutionary explosion” was over by the time of the Chengjiang fauna. It shows further, that the Burgess Shale/Chengjiang fauna was evolutionarily very stable, and changed little over the 15 to 20 million year interval between the two faunas. Thus the pattern for animal evolution was set in the early and middle Cambrian: short periods of rapid, significant change, exemplified by the Cambrian explosion, alternating with long periods of little change, exemplified by the Burgess Shale/Changjiang fauna” (Collins: “The Geology and Biology of the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale, Canada’s Most Important Fossil Fauna”).

      Taxa

      General characteristics

      The Sirius Passet (north east Greenland) fauna is approximately the same age as the Chengjiang fauna, but the two assemblages are not closely similar. Although it is significantly older, the Chengjiang fauna is most easily compared to the Burgess Shale fauna, which does have many families and several genera – though no species – in common. Both Chengjiang and the Burgess Shale are dominated by sponges and arthropods; the two groups together comprising about 60% of each fauna.

      “The Chengjiang fauna is basically a benthic fauna. Most species lived directly on the soft, level bottom. A few burrowed in the silty sediment, for instance linguloid brachiopods and presumeably some worms. We can not state for certain that there were any animals that were permanent swimmers, although it is quite clear that many of the arthropods could swim, many of them perhaps very well. At the same time we realize from the mud-filled guts of several arthropods that in many cases their appendages had not yet evolved into the efficient mouthparts they are in modern arthropods. They fed by simply swallowing mud, and this could of course only be done on the bottom. Similar mud-eating habits were common among the hyoliths, a group of extinct animals which had a cone-shaped shell and an operculum to close the open end.

      “However, some of the arthropods were carnivores, feeding on small arthropods, worms and the like. Nematomorph and pripulid worms and anomalocaridids were also carnivores, who certainly often swallowed their prey in one piece. If the supposed cnidarians really were cnidarians, they would also have been carnivores. Many small arthropods could have fed from carcasses, for instance the ostracode-like bradoriids. Many animals no doubt strained their food directly from the water. This must have been the case with sponges, brachiopods, eldoniids and echinoderms.

      “In summary, we can say that the community is a Burgess Shale-type level-bottom fauna with large proportions of mud-eaters, filter-feeders and carnivores, and with a dominance of arthropods, worms and sponges” (Hou et al. 1999, p. 169-170).

      Perhaps the most surprising aspect of the Chengjiang biota is the wealth of taxa from so many different groups. The fossil assemblages includes diverse algae, medusiform metazoans, chondrophorines, sponges, chancelloriids, ctenophores, cnidarians, nematomorphs, priapulid worms, hyoliths, possible ectoprocts, inarticulate brachiopods, annelid-like animals, anomalocharidids, onychophorans, a wide variety of other arthropods, including trilobites (though few of these), echinoderms, ‘hemichordates’ and probable early chordates, as well as numerous problematical taxa.

      It is not only the diversity and early appearance in the fossil record which makes the Chengjiang assemblage fabulous, but also the fine preservation which offers the opportunity to learn more about the morphology of these early creatures. One of the most outstanding examples might be Microdictyon, the isolated sclerites of which were known from numerous localities on various continents, but none of the specialists had any idea how this creature could have been organized. The discovery of these net-like scales of Microdictyon on a worm-like animal resolved the question (see Ramsköld & Hou 1991).

      References

      Conway Morris, S. 1998a: The crucible of creation. Oxford University Press: 1-242.

      Ho, C. 1942: Phosphate deposits of Tungshan, Chengjiang, Yunnan [in Chinese]. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of China 35: 97-106.

      Hou, X.; Aldridge, R.J.; Bergström, J.; Siveter, D.J.; Siveter, D.J.; Feng, X. 2007: The Cambrian fossils of Chengjiang, China: The flowering of early animal life. Blackwell Publishing: 1-233.

      Hou, X.; Bergström, J.; Wang, H.; Feng, X.; Chen, A. 1999: The Chengjiang Fauna. Exceptionally Well-Preserved Animals from 530 Million Years Ago. Yunnan Science and Technology Press. 170 p. [In Chinese with English summary.].

      Lu, Y. 1941: Lower Cambrian stratigraphy and trilobit fauna from Kunming, Yunnan [in Chinese]. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of China 21: 71-90.

      Mansuy, H. 1912: Etude géologique du Yunnan oriental. Part 2. Paléontologie. Mémoires du Service géologique de l'Indochine 1 (2): 1-146.

      Martin, M.W.; Grazhdankin, D.V.; Bowring, S.A.; Evans, D.A.D.; Fedonkin, M.A.; Kirschvink, J.L. 2000: Age of Neoproterozoic bilaterian body and trace fossils, White Sea, Russia: Implications for metazoan evolution. Science 288: 841-845.

      Ramsköld, L.; Hou, X. 1991: New early Cambrian animal and onychophoran affinities of enigmatic metazoans. Nature 351: 225-228.

      Wang, H. 1941: A brief note on the Cambrian phosphate deposits, Kunyang, Yunnan. Bulletin of the Geological Society of China 21: 67-70.


       Peripatus Home Page pix1Black.gif (807 bytes) Paleontology >> Chengjiang

      Hits counted from :